Help, but there must be conditions. The industry cannot fight innovation anymore. They must get competitive--no more protections.
hmm losing 2 million jobs, so thats to say if the Big 3's were to fail, Americans would just stop buying cars!!! No, id say they would continue to buy American made cars, you know, Hondas, Toyotas, Kias. Jobs will shift to those companys that make what the consumer wants, safe, fuel efficient cars.
I say award thier incompentance with allowing them to fail.
What do we do with the hundreds of thousands of people who will lose their jobs in the car industry and related businesses? Where do these people go for work when jobs are not there? How do they keep their homes, pay for food,get medical insurance or just pay for glasses or dental, or anything else? Do we punish the workers for the stupidity of the car makers? Who will make the trucks and other vehicles needed for our national security, army and the like? China? South Korea? India? If we can't make our own, who will? Is that what we want?
Are we as a country willing to go into a deeper recession even a depression to get back at the auto industry? Or should we place conditions on them on the money we should LOAN them?
This is a very complex issue. Claiming bankruptcy isn't the answer. The airlines are not meaner and leaner; they are charging all kinds fees they had before to make up for every penny they have lost and are losing. Consumer lost there and will lose with the auto industry if they go into bankrupcty.
No we wouldn't. The unions should realize current market conditions and realize they are going to have to take a hit. Yes if the bosses make mistakes the workers take some of the consequences, that is part of the motivation to get an education and not be a worker but a boss. Otherwise why take the extra time, stress or potential for failure? I have a master's in chemistry and I make about half as much money as someone with a high school degree who "works" making cars and when I was in a plant job for one summer I didn't see much work going on. The airlines are better, charging more fees is fine. People travel less take trains which is what we should be doing anyway. The unions are part of the problem so yes they should get some of the hurt. The people who loose their jobs will find others making less money, which they should do anyway.
Let them fail and file for chapter 11, the airlines did and came out leaner and stronger.
Exactly correct. Follow the airlines' path: Chapter 11, renegotiate outrageous union contracts, scale back employment, decrease retirement benefits, require more worker output, etc. They will not change enough until they do. The airline kept flying, and the cars will still be coming off the line.
Sorry, but this is WAY, WAY overdue!
Wow! I finally found a site with intelligent people! I totally agree!
I give my 2 kids $10 for every "A" on there report card. There grandpa is now giving them $20 for any C,D, or F.
How hard do you think my kids will be studying?
Got to love this country for rewarding failure.
Why would you try and rescue an arcane industry? The future of automobiles
is tied to the future of our energy policy.
Wouldn't you first have an end goal and then see if the existing
infrastructure matches where you are headed? Why doesn't the heir apparent
step up to the plate and give us our direction? Is he tied to unionism? Read
"The Audacity of hope" it's laced with inferences to unions.
The days of gasoline/diesel based transportation will soon be replaced by
fuel cells or something other. This call for aid is nothing more than
cronyism/nepotism. Our country has always pandered to corporations not the
people.
3,000,000 peoples' jobs are at stake, not just some simple minded priciple.
When demand goes down, the typical manufacturer lowers production and lays off workers.
Well, with the UAW, you can't do this. When demand goes down, you produce the same and you cannot layoff workers.
you are just so dumb you don't ever know what your talking about. its people like you that gives the uaw a bad name
The industry will correct itself. The premise that 2 million jobs will be lost is unreal but a mere fear tactic. The auto industry will not fall off the face of the earth. American's will still buy vehicles, just at a reduced pace... nothing wrong with that. The jobs locations will shift as likely will the badge they represent (ie, not GM but Toyota or whatever).
Remember the auto makers have already received assistance to the tune of $25 billion. Who really thinks printing more money will help the situation; it only further devalues our world position.
they have not got any money yet
Thank God lets hope they continue not to.
A quick glance at the liabilities attached to each and every auto produced by GM and Ford shows that the legacy contractual agreements in place with the UAW are bleeding the margins from autos. The equivalent salary for UAW workers looks in the +$75 range whereas the Toyota, Isuzu etc. US plants have equivalent labor rates around $45. Now, if we bail out the US autoworkers, what will change that liability? Actually, I believe nothing will change! The money will be spent to keep current contracts in place, or at least till the UAW takes over the legacy health care in 2010, when I believe that they will find that they too will be unable to continue to carry that burden. A UAW health care bail out will then ensue from the Democrat controlled congress and Executive branch. So we can look forward to a bail-out once again in 2010 or soon thereafter but this time of the UAW. Meantime, little will change at Ford or GM where the burden was only partially lifted from the relief from the legacy health care. Of course, nothing changes in this portion of the UAW contract to affect wages.
I also believe that the Democrat controlled Congress and Executive will not allow what almost certainly has to happen...that is the UAW will eventually have to accept a lower wage scale to allow the remaining 2 US automakers to compete. However, if I were a Democrat I might consider legislation wherein the control of wages for all foriegn and domestic auto manufacturing workers be brought into a "fair wage" range. These domestically based foriegn manufacturers might be hit with a legislated package of regulations which level the wage and benefit packages within each manufacturing plant to be on a par with the domestic UAW packages. Tarrifs can be levied on incoming vehicles manufactured elsewhere to assist the government in creating this "leveled playing field". What will happen then? Who knows...your Toyota just got much more expensive. Low margin (read high mileage, efficient) cars will disappear from the US market
Based on history, I cannot see the Democrat congress and Executive allowing business to do what it must to level the playing field in a capitalistic manner: that is to renegotiate the UAW (and other union) wages to match their competition.
Carl,
Adding a tax (thats basically what you're asking for) to bring up foreign automakers prices here in the US because the big 3 can't compete, all that will happen is that foreign auto-makers will either close plants here, and/or add an equal tariff to American made products imported into there country.
There is no more "american" made. Do you mean the Ford car manufactured in mexico with parts from China? Or are you talking about the Japanese car built in the US with US, Chinese, and Japanese parts?
Well said!
People would adjust to the lower wages, sell houses, refinance debt if our greedy banks would let them. The UAW always did get the best for their workers. Their pinning the economic health of the industry to one year is the same problem the banks have. Long term viability and ethical behavior are not considered. They rode high on the hog for a long time and now that hog is about dead. Same for auto management. The UAW should be begging for wage and hour cuts. They have worked the overtime to get the most out of the fixed labor costs, mainly heath care. Health care costs stand in the way of full employment. Universal health care should help this. We are on our way to becoming a third world nation and reject a solution because it is a policy of our enemies in the world eve though all of our allies and done it. I digress.
I totally agree. But i believe that the automakers need to get rid of the UAW union that is there whole problem. Like you said about there wages, they could find hundreds of thousands of people to do the same job for less than $30.00 a hour. I think that you should be a consultant for the automakers. They need to listen to what you have to say also the democratic goverment. You make alot of sense
If there was no UAW, I think that Management would have swept that money off the table into their own pockets. The UAW saw that was happening in the 1930's and fought for the workers fair share. I did not say that union was the problem or that a union should be abolished. All players have contributed to the problem. Now wages are not the problem, rather a retirement system that was underfunded. Good automobiles are now made with minimum defects by robots. The old big three plants are not designed to that level of automation. The system is old and not designed for the major change needed. Time to make the jump to ultralight suburban rail. That could move the majority of our population on the usual short trips. Car could fill in for the long trips until we could build a High Speed Long distance system. 4,000 pound vehicles with 200 hp are a waste of energy, a 5-10 hp engine could move local transport just fine. Reinvent transportation, put everyone to work.
Union workers are over paid you want to be middle class get an education and a skill or produce a new idea or a new way of doing something. Work with the brain is always better than work with the hands.
I'm suggesting that the irrational choice is to impose tarrifs, impart wage controls (price will certainly follow with the government having a large share of the company) and the last thing which a Democrat controlled government will allow to happen will be to let the free market, or what is going to remain, prevail. Legislators may also require certain industries to provide the package of benefits, etc. which bring non-union manufacturing into line with the packages provided by the "big 2 (3)" US automakers. I'm a capitalist at heart and just writing this is killing me!
Its not my mindset I'm talking about but the mindset I have grown used to when socialists run things.
I am dead set against any bailouts for any company. The only bailout that should have happened is for the Fed to force banks to renegotiate loans for people failing on there mortgages.
Again, I am against bailouts, even for mortgages. But in the long run, this would keep prices of homes from dropping further (even if you are paying your mortgage on time, if there are multiple houses in forclosure in your area, it will bring the price of your house down).
This would also keep people from defaulting on the mortgage and the banks would be at least getting money (albeit at a little to no profit, but better than the huge loses).
You'll hear it here first: All our taxes are going to be going up next year, even though Obama said he was going to cut them for anyone earning under 250k year.
If GM failed, I think restructuring under bankruptcy would make it far stronger. The airlines have done it. Will people lose there jobs? You betcha! But when the company turns around, starts producing better vehicles (why aren't any of the European cars sold in the US?), jobs would increase.
The demand for vehicles from the big 3 has plummeted. This needs to change first, until it does, all the money in the world will just delay the inevitable failure of the big 3.
Contracts for government vehicles can require the right changes at the right prices.
What we will get is a nationalized auto industry and a nationalized banking industry. Next will be a nationalized health care and then oh let's say a nationalized transportation industry.
You know what we get then. Take a look at any Soviet Block country because that is where we are headed.
You may not like Capitalism or Republicans but what Pelosi and Reid and Obama are asking for is nothing short of this scenario.
America, as always will survive. The question is in what form. Certainly not what our Founding Fathers envisioned.
I understand the ripple effect and it would have a huge impact. When is enough; enough? The pay and benefits for the skill level are outrageous. Will the auto workers / union compromise or will they continue to demand pay and benefits that most of us only dream of? Will the industry wake up and produce a product equal in quality and fuel efficiency of it foreign competitors for a comparable price. I doubt it; if we provide a bail out where will we find the top executives celebrating? I am tired of seeing the corporate world being bailed out at my expense while friends and family are struggling.
It's not just the waste of time and money within the plant, but the outragous money the brass makes at these companies that becomes a problem. This industry needs an overhaul, period! AND they're not the only ones, if you come with handout you should be willing to implement a plan with the gov. to restructure your industry, at least willing to change your operation IF you get money from taxpayers.
The great Emerson said in his discourse on Compensation -"Things Refuse To Be Mismanaged Long" and the current state of the US auto industry is simply this metaphysical claim coming to fruition. When these auto companies started bleeding $100 million, $200 million a month, this is when they should have started making drastic changes to downsize and/or turn around their direction. Not do nothing and let it grow into $2 billion a month. This is business incompetence at its best and yet these executives keep making their multi-millions in compensation while driving these companies into the ground. What would Henry Ford et al say to these incompetents who are putting to death what he/they created??
The problem is that these incompetents know that they are holding the country's economy at ransom. If the government does give the money (which i don't think they should) the shareholders must vote to fire the people who put these companies where they are right now. What a person/groups is probablistically most likely to do is what they have done before. The pattern has been established - it will happen again.
The golden rule for business, regardless of the size, is to run the business from red to black as opposed from black to red i.e. set up expense infrastructure to even run at a profit at the lowest expected dip in sales. Surely you would expect people making $tens of millions in compensation to be able to understand this most basic of business rules. Obviously not in the case of the US auto industry.
I say let them pay the price for their incompetence.
We have bailed out the banks and this did nothing to stimulate our economy. We bailed out AIG and look where that money is going. How many times do we have to make the same mistake.
The auto industry needs to build cars that fit the economy, not trucks,Suburbans,Escalades,Hummers,etc. Lower your prices and maybe you will see a rise in sales. Make economical vehicles that will benefit us and you will see a rise in sales.
I say who ever is failing needs to fail and whoever is adapting will gain strength and succeed.
We haven't done anything with that money yet, because brilliant Hank and George can't figure out what to do with it. Have a plan BEFORE you ask for money! And think that plan through, that's a new concept. But I live in MI, we've experienced this mess way before the rest of you, but we will lose this state(bailout the state?) if something isn't done soon, but just give them money to do the same thing that got us here, NO!!!
Is it wrong to say "let them eat cake"? I have seen a lot of things over a period of decades in the production of luxury cars...all ways of beefing up the overall price of the car. However, i have seen no progress on making them fuel efficient (as well as affordable...you have to shell out huge amounts for one of those). Can it be that the auto industry is reaping what it has sewn? I have seen evidence that a battery fueled car was created, leased to the public and then instantly recalled and destroyed down to the last model...for reasons unknown. Well, I think i know. In my opinion big oil has led the big auto makers down a primrose path of diminishing returns, and i just don't see why we should suffer for several years while they use our tax dollars to reverse the damage. I didn't put them in this situation-they did.
I gave Ford two chances to impress me with their cars and now I vow to never buy an American car ever again. The first time I drove out of the showroom a 2002 Mustang convertible - $30,000 - within months I had water leaks when it rained, stuck down electric Windows, etc. C'mon! Sold that within 12 months. Second time, for the family it was a brand spanking new 2003 Windstar with the works $38,000- within 3 months electrical problems, stuck sliding doors, reverse collision warning signal died, interior lights died, air conditioner/heater completely died and may other minor items also. The best trade in I could get for my 4 year old $38,000 American car was $5,000 - that's probably also because the dealer had to come and tow it from our driveway because it got to the point that it wouldn't even start.
Then consider during that time, since 2000 we concurrently owned a Lexus RX300 - never had to put a screwdriver to that car. Not once - nada, nothing. Still drive that car today - 8 years later.
So I, just one consumer, had a 100% lemon strike rate with 2 American cars - 2 out of 2! This is why the US auto industry is going under. The $25 billion is only going to go up in smoke. What a waste. Why would you loan money to manufacturers whose product is not good enough to compete on the world market??
Sounds like trouble follows you, I never had a problem with
these cars.
Perhaps your still riding your tricycle ?
Please write or email your elected officials and let them know ,to support President Elect Obama in his efforts to create green jobs that will make us energy independent. America is facing multiple challenges of financial, energy and climate change. JFk said we could put a man on the moon in ten years and we did. There is no reason we can't became energy independent in ten years. For those we say we cant afford it, we can't afford not to. Borrowing money from China to buy oil from other countries has put us in dept. Oil may be cheaper at the moment but the long time cost is catching up to us. Most scientists are telling us global warming is escalating faster then they thought it would. We can create new green energy jobs and electric cars that help rebuild the middle class and make America energy and financially independent. Being green will put us in the black. See the plan at repoweramerica.org
I agree that we should all write our elected officals, but to think that Barack Obamas plan will fix our current problems is insane. You need to get off the political campaining and move into the real world. The election is over, your man won. SAY NO TO ALL BAILOUTS!!! Let all mismanaged companies file for chapter 11 and they will all come back leaner and stonger. Yes there will be job loses, probably alot of them but they are jobs that most likely aren't needed to achive the end product. If our auto workers are making the huge saleries I hear they are making then they should do more work for the money they are getting. They go to work in shorts and go home as clean as when they come to work. They make as much or more than College graduates do after 6 years of college. There is something wrong with that picture. Don't get me wrong, I feel for everyone that loses their job but between the exectutives mismanageing the companies and the union contracts as they are there does not seem to be any other way but failure. I don't want one red cent of my tax dollars going to over payed autoworkers when there was no help for the steel industry that my father worked in back in the 80's. In closing I would like to say that there has never been such cush jobs where I live in Texas but we seem to do pretty darn good.
Perhaps you're responding to another post. Your reply doesn't address anything I stated. The question should be why do college grads make so little. A friend of mine after graduating had to return to truck driving in order to pay huge college loans. Auto workers have made huge concessions in the past years, but car markers have continued making large autos that are not fuel efficient. They have successfully lobbied congress not to make them do so. They even gone so far to prevent California from doing so. It's not just the auto workers who would lose their jobs but many others . It's would start a domino effect in an already very bad recession. I agree with Thomas Friedman Author of "Hot, Flat and Crowded' who stated on MSNBC " Fire the ceos and top management and retool the factories to produce fuel efficient cars." I 'm happy your doing so darn good in the real world. So write your elected officials and let them you are paying attention. The plan to make America energy independent is at repoweramerica.org
I think you represent a very sane arguement. Thanks for saying it so plainly and right. I live in MI and that does seem to sum up the problem. Everyone in the industry will have to change their approach, it's time to step-up folks, who can be the big kid first???
How many young people go to college , then later go after the money or become housewives ?
Sounds like the improper decisions of youth.
Perhaps they get free money and the wrong advice.
Sounds a lot lke the biography of the three big dicks.
Someone needs to start a petition to not help these horrible companies out. Ford turned my life into financial ruin w/ thier 200 focus that i was very young and stupid to buy. It wouldn't of been that bad of a purchase if the car didn't have 30 recalls in one year, completely loose it's value in 5 years , cost me an extra 500$ per month to fix things that broke on top of my car payment, and die and force me to buy acompletely new car @ 82000 miles. I've beenwaiting for Frod to fall flat on it's face for 4 years now. Reap what it's sown. They ruin alot of peoples lives with thier inferior cars that are absolute garbage. If thet get any money they should be forced to give all thier cars a 150,000 mile warranty to pay for thier past sins and all owners that suffered should get a settlement from them. they have alot of lawyers and bak on the stupidity of young , uninformed buyers. I admit itwas my fault for buying thier car, but they made my situation alot worse because i owned a honda previously, and never imagined that a new car could break down so many times. I paid my Ford off, andwasleft with a dead car that hadno value at the end of my loan. I bought a new Toyota Corrolla and haven't looked back since. The fact that nancy Polosi wants to bail her financial base out makes me sick to my stomache. These companies are a bigger tax on the middle class than anything Bush could ever do. These companies deserve to fail. The people working at them are failures themselves since theyneed a union to protect themfrom getting fired for doing a bad job. Honda and Toyota also have plants in Canada and the U.S.. Those people can relocate, since those companies will have a higher volume in sales if the Big 3 go down. They just won't be in thier precious union and have to actually work for the money they earn. The real problem is since those companies are union the people are lazy and want to do as little as possible. At Honda and Toyota when a bad part goes into the assebly line the employees have a lever to stop the assembly lines, correct the problem and make sure all is good. In the union plants, the employees were pulling the lever all the time to stop the assembly line so they could get a break, so the levers were taken away, causing bad parts and such to be installed in the cars and letting the comsumers pay the price, for the union employees lack of work ethic. If they do geta bailout they should bust the unions, get rid of the pensions and retirement healthcare and let those companies pay a fair wage for an honest days work like every other hardworking person that keeps this country going. Unions and obscene pensons are the cause of all our middleclass problems from high property taxes, taxes in general, and allwe consume. Pensions will destroy our lives as we know it. Everybody needs to fight back for the future of your children. You kids shouldn't bepaying for some overpaid town employee to live a lavish retirement with free healthcare for his family, when someone would do the job better for alot less but didn't know the right people.
Integrity is the problem here not the union. They're only as good as the people who are in them. The concept is great but everyone has to want to do their job, the one they were hired for, or you have a mess. HOWEVER, aren't there supervisors at these places??? DO YOUR JOB!!! Even teachers can be fired IF the supervisor does the job!! What a new idea-DO YOUR JOB. Even when no one is looking. Oh and by the way, stay away from complaining about pensions. Do we need poor houses again???? Is this what would make you happy? Pensions are put away from your pay, you pay taxes either before or after the fact, depends on how it's structured. It's forced savings, it works well for most.
waiting4ford2die... you are a moron. A complete and total waste of space. Please don't vote four years from now. I'll not even justify your incompetence by saying which side I take in this argument. I don't care which side you take. Your statement was as worthless as could be. Do us all a favor, and next time your fingers twitch their way to the keyboard, make your thumbs happy. Give them some company and just sit on your fingers. We would all be better off. Fewer kilobytes would be used up in cyberspace, and generally the planet would be in better shape. Perhaps it is a start towards reversing global warming. I am reminded of a line from a movie: "All of us are now dumber for having listened to you."
When Eastern Airlines went under, their planes did not go to the junkyard, and I suspect their pilots did not become unemployed. They just flew for a different airline. If the "Big 3" go under, some better run company will buy the facilities. The employees of the new company will not have the fat contracts and benefits that the United Auto Workers were able to secure, with the help of the Democratic Party, but the UAW, along with inept and greedy management both conspired to kill the golden goose.
I would not under any circumstance buy a vehicle from Ford, GM or Chrylser right now because I have zero confidence that any of them will be around in a year. The warranty would be meaningless. I would have more confidence in their future if they were forced to reorganize under bankruptcy laws which would require streamlining operations and management, and allow renegotiation of contracts and shedding of some of their "legacy expenses" (pensions and health care benefits for retired UAW workers). Delta airlines (unlike Eastern) declared bankruptcy and continued on stronger than before.
If they remain saddled with "legacy costs" that their competitors don't have to pay, they will never be viable. They only way they could successfully get enough people to buy their product, which has to cost more because of these expenses, would be if they made a clearly superior product, which they do not. Detroit made vehicles have improved in quality but few people see them as superior to the Japanese made vehicles.
American workers can build an excellent vehicle. They are doing so at Toyota plants, Honda plants etc.
Any "loan" given them in their present incarnation will never be repaid. It will be money wasted, handed to the "Big 3" as they are circling the drain, and much of it will go to pay the pensions and health benefits of UAW members who don't even work anymore. To do this with tax payer dollars at a time when many Americans are facing job loss, or have already lost their job, have no health benefits at all, have no pension, and have lost the hope of ever being able to retire, would be a travesty indeed.
Just watch "Who Killed the Electric Car" on YouTube. GM had their chance, they created an amazing electric car when California placed a zero emissions mandate on the state. GM met the requirements, put out the EV1, then fought California to lift the regulation. Once lifted, GM went in and swiped ever last EV1 being driven and destroyed it! DESTROYED IT! The drivers of the cars were crushed! Now they want "we the people" to bail them out". Is this some kind of joke! Perhaps they should go to their oil buddies and ask them for a loan!!! I'm all about saving jobs, but GM deserves to go down! If my business goes down do you think the government would help me...NO!
Oh and by the way, a new Electirc Highway Sudan much like GM's EV1 is comming out in 2010. A small car company is making it, and when it does come out I will be the first to buy one! I'm not supportiing American car and oil companies anymore! Oh and one more thing...hydroeclectric fuel cells...it's just another non renewable resource the oil and car companies are trying to push!
To check out the car go t:
#hsv.swf
The US Goverment was an investor in our industry during WWII. I worked for Corning Glass, one of the companys to benefit. Property of the United States Gov. was on metal plates attatched to lots of stuff. Even the toilet paper dispensers. I was there to watch the demise of Corning. I saw little respect for the workers in the factory. Way too many managers, with huge salaries and perks and an every day 'PRODUCTION MEETING' that lasted for hours.
This could be a big opportunity to get a whole lot of alternate energy cars on the roads. Congress needs to help the Auto Industry but with a few changes from the old way. There should be No Golden Parrachutes & 50% Salary cuts for ALL Corporate Managers (This way, those not committed to productivity,will wander off) plus Money MUST go to ReTooling for alternative energy cars.! Violators should be held accountable to Federal Criminal Charges..for theft and fraud...oh, and make the guilty serve time.
It will be good to get past the big oil and auto industry that has stifled innovation for so long.
I see no alternative but to help them. The money should be given as a loan with restrictions applied. We are talking about millions of more jobs our country cannot afford to lose.
With the finanical crisis bailout, we have no idea what is actually happening with the money. There seems to be no oversight or restrictions. Heard their claim that the criminal CEO's will get their bonuses because they are already in the budget. How and why is our government going along with this?? We taxpayers need to be yelling loud and clear we cannot and will not allow such mismanagement of our money.
What sucks is that we coulod yell loud and clear as long and as much as we want, but our elected Senate and Reps will not listen to us. They voted for the bailout because I am sure the got kickbacks from Banking, CEO's, etc.
I would like to see a vote to see what to do with the money, if they used that 700 billion and gave a rebate check to everyone that filed an income tax return and making less that 250k a year, I am sure that would have been 100 times better for the economy that giving the money to banks so the upper management could get richer and get the extra ferrari this year.
The US Goverment was an investor in our industry during WWII. I worked for Corning Glass, one of the companys to benefit. Property of the United States Gov. was on metal plates attatched to lots of stuff. Even the toilet paper dispensers. I was there to watch the demise of Corning. I saw little respect for the workers in the factory. Way too many managers, with huge salaries and perks and an every day 'PRODUCTION MEETING' that lasted for hours.
This time, congress needs to help the Auto Industry but with a few changes from the old way. There should be No Golden Parrachutes & 50% Salary cuts for ALL Corporate Managers (This way, those not committed to productivity,will wander off) plus Money MUST go to ReTooling for alternative energy cars.! Violators should be held accountable to Federal Criminal Charges..for theft and fraud...oh, and make the guilty serve time.
If you let them fold then we lose 2 million jobs across the country can we afford that. Maybe they should give me the money to buy the car or at least let me get a loan to buy the car. The problem is no one can get credit to buy a car you can give them all the money in the world but if no one can get a loan to buy the car it does no one any good. Tell the banks that if they dont start loaning money then we want are bail out money back from the CEO's,
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
2 million jobs. We can't absorb losing 2 million jobs.