MSNBC Home
Newsvine Home
MSN Home
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
More tagged , ,
advertisement

What do you think about deflation?

advertisement
Ready To Join?

Newsvine is msnbc.com's social-news community where you can discuss stories, publish your own column, and connect with other news lovers.

Ready To Join?

Results with 396 short comments
Total of 34,310 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

39.5%
I am worried it will hurt the economy more.
13,553 votes
45.8%
I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.
15,711 votes
14.7%
I don't understand why this is a problem.
5,046 votes
Display Comments:
I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

While some prices may fall temporarily as demand slackens, prices will pick up again when demand picks up. Long term price trend is up.

{"commentId":4140639,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"captom"}
  • 4 votes
 - 1:27 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

I believe this will help to stimulate our economy. Car companies should do the same. Some profit as opposed to none!

{"commentId":4140702,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"d2miller1"}
  • 7 votes
 - 1:30 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

For the time being, it's good for working people. But this is a complicated issue, and deserves more than just a multiple choice question.

{"commentId":4140781,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"brettr4763"}
  • 8 votes
 - 1:34 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

For selfish reasons, I am happy to see prices go down. I am retired, living on a fixed income and watching my investments dwindle to nothin

{"commentId":4141363,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"linda-7"}
  • 2 votes
 - Linda C
 - 2:04 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
I am worried it will hurt the economy more.

WAGES WILL EVENTUALLY FOLLOW PRICES IN A DOWNWARD SPIRAL....THE COST OF MONEY WILL RAPIDLY RISE LEAVING THE MIDDLE CLASS IN A BIND.

{"commentId":4141515,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"ttyskiewicz"}
     - 2:11 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
    I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

    Especially Gas!! Though it won't last.

    {"commentId":4141771,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"onegemini77"}
    • 4 votes
     - 2:23 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
    I don't understand why this is a problem.

    The East Coast probably has problems, but as for westerners-we're already hurting-costs more for less, jobs gone, layoffs here, food cost u

    {"commentId":4141836,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"kpealstrom"}
    • 2 votes
     - 2:26 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
    I don't understand why this is a problem.

    We are giving billions to crooks. No one will have any money to put into the banks or buy a car. We need groceries and clothes for our kids

    {"commentId":4141878,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"rosedogs5"}
    • 6 votes
     - Moskie
     - 2:29 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
    I am worried it will hurt the economy more.

    Deflation = Depresssion; It's not geometry,it's basic math.

    {"commentId":4141926,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"johnsonrr80"}
    • 1 vote
     - 2:31 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
    I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

    Short term, deflation will restore a balance between purchasing power and wages. Long term, yikes!

    {"commentId":4141927,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"thomas-nelson"}
    • 5 votes
     - 2:31 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
    I don't understand why this is a problem.

    enoiugh said

    {"commentId":4142198,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"PastorJR"}
       - 2:48 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
      I am worried it will hurt the economy more.

      If it negatively affects howe well people can buy and sell things, it will be a problem. There needs to be more of an explanation of it to

      {"commentId":4142331,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"samstein638"}
      • 2 votes
       - 2:56 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
      I am worried it will hurt the economy more.

      If Congress wants consumers to spend, work on job creation. Jobless claims do not not count those who are ineligible for unemployment.

      {"commentId":4142549,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"stgreg11"}
      • 4 votes
       - Dugger
       - 3:10 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
      I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

      This is what the economy needs the consumer needs it... its time for prices to drop... but Oil will go up and drive up prices again

      {"commentId":4142616,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"whitley99"}
      • 2 votes
       - 3:14 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
      I am worried it will hurt the economy more.

      The GOP needs to get its head out of its collective ass

      {"commentId":4142618,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"diverdog54"}
         - 3:14 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
        I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

        A recovery that follows deflation would at least mean that people's savings aren't wiped out.

        {"commentId":4142781,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"chickinsaw"}
           - 3:24 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
          I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

          The oil should stay down. The big oil has made all the
          money now, so it is time we get some money off.

          {"commentId":4142832,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"condie85706"}
          • 3 votes
           - Condie
           - 3:27 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
          I am worried it will hurt the economy more.

          Most Americans are in debt and they will pay those debts off with dollars that are worth more than the dollars they borrowed.

          {"commentId":4142861,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"leeisok"}
          • 3 votes
           - LeeisOK
           - 3:28 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
          I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

          To bad it doesn't happen just out West. My house on the West Coast is 3 times the same house/neighborhood etc back East.

          {"commentId":4142883,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"mrobert4535"}
             - Bob McQ
             - 3:29 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
            I am worried it will hurt the economy more.

            If we're on a deflationary course, here comes the next once every hundred years experience . . . another Great Depression?

            {"commentId":4142905,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"lorainel"}
            • 1 vote
             - 3:30 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
            I am worried it will hurt the economy more.
            {"commentId":4143069,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"thidalgo84"}
               - 3:40 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
              I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

              This is the press making a story out of a mole hill. As unemployment goes up deflation happens. Once jobs are restored problem solved.

              {"commentId":4143201,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"michael-tully"}
              • 6 votes
               - 3:48 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
              I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

              as one of the main st crowd, gas,groceries, (that all we can buy) can only help us, dont know about the economy.

              {"commentId":4143339,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"marthaholloman"}
              • 2 votes
               - 3:55 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
              I am happy to see prices go down. It seems like a good thing.

              Deflation is necessary to drive the market, housing, and consumer spending back to sustainable levels. After that, who knows what is next?

              {"commentId":4143632,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"smrtcookie04"}
              • 9 votes
               - 4:12 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
              I don't understand why this is a problem.

              Defelation? Where? Aside from the price of gas and pricing of new homes (which no one can get a loan for) everything else in AZ is going u

              {"commentId":4143692,"threadId":"424205","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"ahnkra"}
              • 3 votes
               - ahnkra
               - 4:16 pm EST on Thu Nov 20, 2008
              advertisement

              Newsvine Discussion with 226 comments - Click here to jump to the comment form.

              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 ... 7
              {"commentId":4151778,"authorDomain":"willdomin8u"}

              What continually astounds me is how a lot of people think that when Obama takes office that somehow magically all of these problesm will be fixed.  IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.  People - wake up - the government is not going to do anything to help you.  You best get off your bee hinds and get out, get educated, get a job, and work like crazy, because that's the only way this country can be fixed. 

              Continuing to blame Bush is just an excuse to bask in your own ineptitude and laziness.  You can either be part of the problem, or part of the solution.   

              {"commentId":4151778,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"willdomin8u"}
                Reply#21 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:00 AM EST
                {"commentId":4152536,"authorDomain":"ujerzy"}

                Working like crazy will not fix this country, so long as it continues to spend beyond its means.  Our federal government has been spending money that is not being contemporaneously generated by tax revenues for decades now.  The current bailout of the the financial industries is adding more than 7% to the national debt in one fell swoop, and the story now is that even the 700 billion (actually 950 billion with the additional tacked on spending that was added to get the needed votes for the second go around on the bailout) isn't enough.  In the meantime we have the big three auto companies coming hat in hand asking for them to be bailed out, but with no plan that would show a likelihood of turning the companies around to being profitable should the feds throw money at them.

                Governments spending beyond their means requires them to raise the revenue somewhere.  That means increase taxes - both on income and on spending.  My household with two professionals as income earners is seeing just under one half of every gross dollar earned going towards paying one form of tax or another.  While the largest chunk for us goes towards employment related taxes (FICA, Medicare, state and federal income taxes, the ATM, unemployment taxes (I am self employed)), when the taxes on spending are added, the total amount paid in combined taxes is just under 50 cents per dollar.  There is a limit to how much the government can tax people , whether on income, which has been the focus of "tax relief" for a while now, or on spending - which in places like Cook County, Illinois has now resulted in a 10% tax, which is the highest in the country, and the local government entities relying on that money still are not able to come to a balanced budget.   

                In the very near future the debt service on the national debt will approach 50% of all money going into federal coffers being used to pay interest on the debt.  Just as a consumer facing that kind of debt is not going to be able to "work their way out of it", the federal government will not be able to raise enough tax revenue to prevent the debt service from overwhelming it.   Federal spending (and local and state government spending - they are generally not much better) is like trying to bail out a sinking boat by drilling more holes into the bottom of it.  It will not work long term. 

                It is time fiscal responsibility became a phrase that has real meaning.  This country is seeing what living beyond the consumers means can do to the economy (and the sad fact is that the vast majority of Americans are not in debt over their heads and can pay their obligations (provided that they don't soon lose their jobs or are hit with a major health catastrophy).  Government is no different in the long run, and that is exactly what our leaders, with one bailout plan after another, have lost sight of.

                So go ahead and try to work yourself out of this mess - so long as Uncle Sam is spending money as fast as he can print it without any serious regard to whether tax revenues are generating enough to cover the bill - we will not fix what ails this country.

                {"commentId":4152536,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"ujerzy"}
                • 1 vote
                #21.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:59 AM EST
                {"commentId":4155006,"authorDomain":"djwxman"}

                So, everyone is getting all excited over a 1% deflation...Yes you read it right, 1%.

                By comparison  the stock market has dropped 45%, and crude oil has dropped 60%, real estate has dropped (est) 25%.  In my mind, we are basically rolling back prices (ie. the value of a dollar) about 15 years. and that works out nicely for the Clinton wannabee Mr. Obama. He's for change? He is Bill Clinton in disguise--where's Monica Lewinsky? ...my point is that we should see a deflation, or a correction of the value of money. The wages, and prices should drop back to the equivilant of the early 1990's.

                {"commentId":4155006,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"djwxman"}
                • 1 vote
                #21.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:35 PM EST
                {"commentId":4161690,"authorDomain":"anschauer01"}

                Dan-665495, you forgot gold, which has dropped 40%, and silver which has dropped 45%, and corn, almost 50% -- ALL commodities ared ropping because nobody is them because nobody - including the Chinese - is making anything.  And, by the way, check the 1890's and 1930's - manufactuers' prices lagged about a year behind commodities prices collapses.  Of course, with our just in time system, I expect prices on manufactured goods and processed foods to fall sometime early next year.

                {"commentId":4161690,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"anschauer01"}
                  #21.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:23 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4166571,"authorDomain":"frankenberry"}

                  tom, every comment I read of yours indicates that you really are disconnected with reality.  Seriously.  Talkign about commodities, gold on paper has dropped, but try to go out and buy some.  Same with Silver.  you will see there is as much a disconnect with the paper comex markets with the street price of these commedities as there is with your perception of reality.  Corn was fueled with fraudulent biofuel, its own little bubble.  Oil will skyrocket again, there is little question.  Demand destruction has not taken place, this is simple economc gobbledegook.

                  Using your own egregiously flawed argument, demand destrruction takes years to affect prices. Oil was 147 / barrell less than 1/2 year ago.  Silver was over 20/oz less than half a year ago.

                  Next.

                  {"commentId":4166571,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"frankenberry"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #21.4 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:59 AM EST
                  {"commentId":4172419,"authorDomain":"h20bouy-99"}

                  I am educated and I can't find a job.  25 years experience and a MBA and no work.  I used to have vocational skills I could fall back on but my back won;t let me do that kind of work anymore.

                  {"commentId":4172419,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"h20bouy-99"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #21.5 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:41 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4176868,"authorDomain":"frankenberry"}

                  you are educated in the wrong things.  your education was likely based on a paper skill set of chasing peices of paper with zeros and incantations on it.  Better re-educate yourself. 

                  {"commentId":4176868,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"frankenberry"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #21.6 - Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:51 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4186187,"authorDomain":"cc7491"}

                  Work? Where?

                  {"commentId":4186187,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"cc7491"}
                  • 2 votes
                  #21.7 - Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:48 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4285334,"authorDomain":"doyou"}

                  I feel like the grocery stores are now gouging us as they keep raising there prices and sending more jobs to India (my sorrow for lives lost in the Mumbai tragedy).  My grocery bill keeps rising, maybe Dow Chemical can lower their prices on plastic.  Great discussion

                  {"commentId":4285334,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"doyou"}
                    #21.8 - Thu Dec 4, 2008 3:28 AM EST
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":4151990,"authorDomain":"reachme"}

                    Prices will fall until the market sets them.  What we are seeing right now are prices falling to the level where they should be if consumers are not relying on credit for purchases.  Credit purchases negate some of the decision making.  For instance, a computer costs $1,000, but on a credit card that's only perhaps $50/mo.  So the purchase decision (utility calculation) is biased toward the monthly payment.  In this "new" economy people are being faced with the decision to pay $1,000 up front, changing their utility calculation.  So prices must fall for the concumer to see more utility.  Welcome to the past!

                    Electronic goods have been deflationary for years, and the industry has boomed through innovation and understanding consumer desires.  The current deflationary period will settle once producers understand people now need more utility from their purchases in order to make larger initial outlays.  This correction is a positive development of the poor economy as producers will be forced to innovate or fail.  Let's see if Detroit gets the message...

                    {"commentId":4151990,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"reachme"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#22 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:20 AM EST
                    {"commentId":4152048,"authorDomain":"fueledbymeatgravy"}

                    I believe that this is just another fear tactic employed by the government to continue to scare the american people into believing that nothing will ever get better and to continue to have a belief that we are all going to die. The oil prices are not the problem. We continue to be focused on the problem and just pipe dream the soultion, like it's not attainable or something. Everyone wants to keep feeding fear and that's not gonna get anything done.

                    {"commentId":4152048,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"fueledbymeatgravy"}
                      Reply#23 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:24 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4152062,"authorDomain":"mbrad45"}

                      I have the excellent solution to the problem.  Let the whole damn system collapse and let's start over.  It's the price we pay for the 28-year binge we've been on.  Time to settle the tab; and special blame can go to our last three Commanders in Chief who went hell bent for election for globilization, thinking it would make their rich friends a fast buck.  Well, guess what; all that plant and equipment and jobs they shipped overseas.  It's gonna be worthless and that's exactly what they get.  I hope they all climb into a high building on Wall Street and jump off.

                      {"commentId":4152062,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"mbrad45"}
                        Reply#24 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:25 AM EST
                        {"commentId":4152122,"authorDomain":"wb666greene"}

                        Debtors want inflation whcih punishes people who have saved and lived within their means.

                        "Why buy a $1200 flat panel if it might be $800 in six months?"  Well the computer industry has done quite well with this business model these past 20+ years.  If you are patinet and pay for what you buy instead of borrowing to buy it,  saving for six months instead of whipping out the plastic is a very smart thing under deflation.

                        In the long run, getting people back to being savers instead of debtors will be a good thing.  I say don't prevent deflation, just slow it down so people have a chance to learn to deal with it.

                        I welcome deflation, especially in real-estate, my property taxes are way too high, no way in reality is my lot worth more than the house and garage that sits on it! But this is how Houston financed its sports palaces without "tax increases", instead jacking up land values to raise revenue.

                        {"commentId":4152122,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"wb666greene"}
                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#25 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:30 AM EST
                        {"commentId":4152707,"authorDomain":"ujerzy"}

                        Jacking up land values is a tax increase.  The assessed value of the land sets a floor against which a number is multiplied to determine what you actual tax bill is going to be.  The number multiplied against the assessed value is determined by how much the various taxing bodies that get revenue from property taxes need.  Generally, the higher your assessed value the more you will be taxed.  This is always true if the multiplier remains the same.  Occasionally, assessed values go down, but because the needs of the various taxing bodies remain the same or go up, they just use a higher multiplier, with the end result being that what you actually pay in tax has gone up.

                        I've seen it happen here in Illinois.  The assessed value (which is the only number you are allowed to file a tax protest over) went down, but the multiplier went up, and the next thing you know is that your real estate taxes went up.  Here, the tax payer doesn't know what the multiplier will be until it is too late to protest.

                        So, they did raise your taxes in Houston - they just did it in a sneaky way.

                        You can also bet that the tax assessor will not be taking into account the fact that real estate values are plummeting when assessing your property.  While they have taken into account the increasing value in real estate when prices went up, for them to use lower assessed values now that values are going down is going to result in tax revenue shortfalls (or the need to use a ridiculously higher multiplier), so the assessors generally ignore the reality of real estate values having plummetted. 

                        Property taxes are a particularly lousy tax.  Because of them you never ever really own any land, and if you fail to pay, they have a system that lets them take the land away from you. 

                        {"commentId":4152707,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"ujerzy"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #25.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:10 AM EST
                        Reply
                        {"commentId":4152145,"authorDomain":"sharlene24"}

                        <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

                        It seems to me deflation is not hard to fix; just print more money.  The real problem we have right now is that we need to deficit spend like crazy (think FDR and WPA) but we already have a huge debt.  Every economist in the world would says deficit spend in recessions/depressions, and run surpluses in good times. Idiot Bush decided to deficit spend big time in the good times - worst President ever, no doubt about it.

                        {"commentId":4152145,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"sharlene24"}
                          Reply#26 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:31 AM EST
                          {"commentId":4152183,"authorDomain":"Rick01002"}

                          It seems to me deflation is not hard to fix; just print more money.  The real problem we have right now is that we need to deficit spend like crazy (think FDR and WPA) but we already have a huge debt.  Every economist in the world would say deficit spend in recessions/depressions, and run surpluses in good times. Idiot Bush decided to deficit spend big time in the good times - worst President ever, no doubt about it.

                          {"commentId":4152183,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"Rick01002"}
                            Reply#27 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:34 AM EST
                            {"commentId":4152799,"authorDomain":"ujerzy"}

                            Printing more money results in inflation.  Restricting the amount of money in circulation generally triggers deflation. 

                            The bailouts are all about printing money.  People holding on to their money, cutting back, trying not to spend, reduces money in circulation and contributes to driving prices down and creating deflation. 

                            Personally, I have no problem with deflation and think that it is needed. 

                            {"commentId":4152799,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"ujerzy"}
                              #27.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:15 AM EST
                              Reply
                              {"commentId":4152225,"authorDomain":"ujerzy"}

                              The article cited two "downsides" to deflation:  people might delay buying items hoping that prices will further decrease; and for those with debt, repayment will be relatively more expensive.

                              As to the first "downside" - so what?  People routinely wait for sales anyway.  If it is a necessary item, you buy it now anyway.  If it isn't a needed item and you can wait, delaying a purchase is not the end of the world, even if many people waited.  This is really only an issue with regard to truly discretionary spending to begin with, and I just don't see the possible putting of the brakes to discretionary spending being a problem.  It will lead to an increase in savings immediately, which in turn could lead to more investing, and when a purchase is finally made, it will be less reliant on credit.  The overuse of credit is what largely contributed to the problems we now have to begin with.  Deflation for those who have money to spend results in things being more affordable.  Our national housing market has been in need of that for more than a decade now, and the continued increase in housing costs has resulted in the crazy loan schemes that have triggered the current crises - a crises that was largely supported by the unrealistic view that housing prices (and hence value) would just simply continue on an upward trend anyway. 

                              As for the second "downside", a more realistic view would include looking at what is going to happen anyway.  People buried in debt are going to bankrupt out of it and go for the "fresh start".  Many really won't have any other choice, particularly when faced with job loss and/or out of control health related debts.  Further, there are many people who are not buried in debt, and being able to buy more with what they have has got to be a stimulous to the economy, especially if they continue to consume within their means.  Those who have some debt, but not enough to bankrupt, could also benefit from deflation in that expenditures for needed things go down, leaving more to use to pay down their debt.  I really fail to see why deflation is such a boogyman.  Some will say that wages will go down - that may or may not be true, but wages almost never keep up with inflation anyway, so what is the real point with that argument?  Even if wages go down, so does the cost of goods, and in the end one result is going to be a stronger dollar, particularly if deflation is not occurring at the same rate in the countries whose currency is being compared to the dollar. 

                              Where deflation is going to cause real problems is with the large debtors who cannot easily bankrupt - and that group includes government entities that are the worst offenders of all when it comes to not living within their means.  It is beyond high time that our federal government stop increasing the national debt by spending like a drunk sailor on shore leave.  State government and local government need to do the same thing.  Arguing that inflation is good for debtors, particularly large sovereign debtors who have no meaningful credit limits, is only going to result in continued spending beyond tax revenues, and sooner or later someone is going to have to pay the piper.  But by then, the debt will have spiraled so far out of control that inflation (which generally hurts everyone immediately anyway) will not realistically make repayment easier, but will instead just position these large debtors so that they have no choice by bankruptcy.  When that happens to governments, it boils down to debtor nations obtaining debt relief from the creditor nations in the form of total or partial debt forgiveness.  Numerous third world countries have in the past found themselves in that situation, and before the U.S. is in that predicament it needs to put a stop to the out of control spending it is currently engaging in.  As it is, the national debt is getting so large that in the very near future half of the revenues collected by the U.S. government will be going towards servicing interest on the national debt.  As with a consumer who sees more and more of their income going towards interest payments, there will soon come a time when interest on the debt has overwhelmed the debtor.

                              In short, I don't see deflation as the boogyman the article wants to portray it as.  Short term it is good for those in a struggling economy, and in my view, long term it will help bring prices back down to a sustainable level.  The real fly in the ointment is the fact that government is likely to continue spending beyond its means, which in the short term will mean ever increasing taxes in one form or another, and in the long term will result in economic collapse because there is only so much in taxes that can be levied before it becomes a completely useless endeavor.  You can't tax incomes that don't exist, you can't take all of those incomes that do exist, and taxes on spending have their limits also.        

                              {"commentId":4152225,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"ujerzy"}
                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#28 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:36 AM EST
                              {"commentId":4152431,"authorDomain":"rise-of-stealthy-traffic-cameras-fuels-disgust"}

                              As naive as I am, perhaps and admittedly so! I do not see what the problem is, I think that the economy will work itself with checks and balances inthe future what ever distance.

                              {"commentId":4152431,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"rise-of-stealthy-traffic-cameras-fuels-disgust"}
                                Reply#29 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:52 AM EST
                                {"commentId":4152568,"authorDomain":"ru4real6846"}

                                I'm glad to see gas prices go down. For awhile there, it was way too high and the oil companies were making billions of dollars in profit. And it's good to see housing prices go down, because in the first place, they weren't worth the asking price. People tend to bite off more than they can chew and then they can't afford to pay and that's when foreclosure comes into play. Once Barack Obama gets in office, this country will see a big change for the better. It won't be like it has been for the past eight years. Americans  will be able to live again.

                                {"commentId":4152568,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"ru4real6846"}
                                  Reply#30 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:02 AM EST
                                  {"commentId":4152726,"authorDomain":"mchildress"}

                                  The prices of everything were artificially inflated and reflected price gouging by greedy marketers.  It's about time the prices started to go back to a realistic level.  People will not "hold off" to buy things for 6 months, hoping the prices will fall even further!  People are so broke they can't afford to pay their house payments--hence the record foreclosure rates.  What will happen is that those fortunate to have enough for discretionary spending will take advantage of the lower prices knowing that the future is uncertain at best!  The rest will finally be able to fill their gas tank instead of putting only $15.00 in to get them through until they can add another $15.00, and buy food.  Get a grip.

                                  {"commentId":4152726,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"mchildress"}
                                    Reply#31 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:11 AM EST
                                    {"commentId":4152736,"authorDomain":"cnichols1983"}

                                    This seems to me like we heading back to reality.  This is a direct reflection of the deregulation of our economy leading to price gauging and minipulation of markets.  The cost of producing goods skyrocketed with the rise of oil prices leading to record shattering profits for oil companies all while the consumers wages have stayed the same.  As the wave of underqualified people recieving loans and credit increased, the amount of real money being spent decreased.  Now people are left with too many bills, lenders are not getting paid back, and people don't have the money to spend, or the qualifications for loans.  In the mean time, the people who artificially inflated the market and ran countless industries like autos and housing into the ground are making out like bandits with millions and even billions of dollars.  People on both sides are guilty, and things will probably level out where they were around the year 2000. 

                                    {"commentId":4152736,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"cnichols1983"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#32 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:12 AM EST
                                    {"commentId":4152742,"authorDomain":"birdyshooter"}

                                    The Japanese philosophy of business is simple, "A small profit and endure forever" as apposed to Exxon's philosophy of "a windfall profit and the public be damned"

                                    {"commentId":4152742,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"birdyshooter"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#33 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:12 AM EST
                                    {"commentId":4152858,"authorDomain":"cnichols1983"}

                                    Ahmen Craig!  I work for Toyota and that is why we are still selling cars and opening plants in the U.S. while the big three fight for survival.  I guess that is what they get for preying on unqualified buyers and giving people what they want instead of what they need.

                                    {"commentId":4152858,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"cnichols1983"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    #33.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:19 AM EST
                                    {"commentId":4153868,"authorDomain":"djt1951"}

                                    This attitude is why I will never buy a foreign car, whether or not it is made in this country. Profits leave this country, and pretty soon, so will production. Keep working for Toyota( and every other foreign manufacturer) and pretty soon you will be just like any other American...out of a job. When the big three go out of business, so will competition and so will your job.

                                    {"commentId":4153868,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"djt1951"}
                                      #33.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:21 AM EST
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":4153096,"authorDomain":"harleyd94580"}

                                      I am sick off our Government and all these companies that keep try to fool the American people with all these doom and gloom warnings... Hurry if we don't get 700 billion the world will end, GM - give us 25 billion or the world will end.. Now you all are trying to tell us thing are to cheap. Give us a freaking break, I like cheap.. Its time for you all to stay are from the TV cameras and you keyboard. NO MORE BAIL OUTS PERIOD.. THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN...

                                      {"commentId":4153096,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"harleyd94580"}
                                        Reply#34 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:34 AM EST
                                        {"commentId":4153186,"authorDomain":"salahzos"}

                                        Deflation! Inflation! Financial Crisis! Stock Market Collapse! Bailouts! Automakers Broke! This, that....

                                        Sky is falling?

                                        Oceans are drying?

                                        Global warming or freezing?

                                        Gas prices up or down?

                                        Have we invaded Iran yet?

                                        Any layoffs today?

                                        Republican, Democrat, Liberal, Green party, Micky mouse party, Right, Left, Up, down, sideways?

                                        Is my credit history perfect?

                                        What else do I need to worry about?

                                        {"commentId":4153186,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"salahzos"}
                                          Reply#35 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:40 AM EST
                                          {"commentId":4153399,"authorDomain":"kevindanson"}

                                          Deflation is the natural result to the bursting of a gigantic debt bubble. Deflation is a horrible monster, far worse than inflation. Most articles written about it focus too much on prices falling as a good thing. The problem really is that ASSET VALUES fall; just look at your stock portfolio or 401K for example; or the value of your home.

                                          The reason it is a such a monster is because it is accompanied by business failures and mass layoffs, forcing people to burn through their savings or sell off assets that have lost much of their value.

                                          The problem can be remedied by printing press money; described as a "helicopter drop" by Ben Bernanke. The problem is main street is hurting like never before and the "helicopter money" thus far has gone to wall street and it has been squandered on things like bonus's for executives and junkets for companies like AIG. THIS IS NOT GOOD.  

                                          This is leaving people destitute and something really should be done about it soon. Thus far $3 trillion has been printed and given to wall street. If this same amont were distributed to each American taxpayer, that would translate to about $15,000, which would help people pay down their debts, become current on their mortgages and stimulate retail spending.

                                          This would weaken the value of the US dollar, but would not seriously harm it. It would offset the super strong deflationary forces that are in now in full swing.

                                          {"commentId":4153399,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"kevindanson"}
                                          • 2 votes
                                          Reply#36 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:52 AM EST
                                          {"commentId":4161773,"authorDomain":"anschauer01"}

                                          Nice to see another intelligent comment here.  Yes, I read all these idiots who think cheaper prices, great - but don't get that EVERYTHING is losing value, including their LABOR.  The only thing that will retain value is CASH and if you want to know what it's like to live in an economy where ONLY cash has value, ask someone who lived thru the 1930's as an adult.

                                          {"commentId":4161773,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"anschauer01"}
                                            #36.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:31 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4168800,"authorDomain":"frankenberry"}

                                            Tom, where does Cash derive its value? 

                                            {"commentId":4168800,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"frankenberry"}
                                              #36.2 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:36 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":4221431,"authorDomain":"jimpslc"}

                                              KD0858..........38% of owner occupied homes in the US are paid off, mortgage free.....how many citizens actually have 401K's or stock porfolios....

                                              {"commentId":4221431,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"jimpslc"}
                                                #36.3 - Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:18 PM EST
                                                Reply
                                                {"commentId":4153404,"authorDomain":"nicholino"}

                                                I don't think it is healthy to worry about the economy.  When disaster strikes the United States and multitudes of people are affected, people respond with kindness and generosity.  "The greatest thing we have to fear, is fear itself."  If everybody worries, people will hoard, things will get worse, people will get desperate, crime will go up. 

                                                {"commentId":4153404,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"nicholino"}
                                                  Reply#37 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:52 AM EST
                                                  {"commentId":4153424,"authorDomain":"nicholino"}

                                                  The best thing people can do is to to help the economy is to be generous.  Get out of debt yourself, help others get out of debt, teach people to be manage money responsibly, and become producers rather than just consumers.  Compete in the market.  Don't let the market control you. 

                                                  {"commentId":4153424,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"nicholino"}
                                                    Reply#38 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:53 AM EST
                                                    {"commentId":4153509,"authorDomain":"captrons"}

                                                    It would help the economy if we had a 2 week blackout of negative news about the economy.

                                                    How do you expect the consumer confidence will go up when we are told hourly how bad it is.

                                                    The media makes consumer confidence.  Don 't tell us how bad it is.  See the good and it get better.

                                                    {"commentId":4153509,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"captrons"}
                                                      Reply#39 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:58 AM EST
                                                      {"commentId":4153912,"authorDomain":"djt1951"}

                                                      Yes, let's everybody put on our rose colored glasses and sing Kumbayaa.

                                                      {"commentId":4153912,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"djt1951"}
                                                        #39.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:23 AM EST
                                                        Reply
                                                        {"commentId":4153511,"authorDomain":"btemple14"}

                                                        We as Americans have had it to good for to long. We take everything forgranted. We need to stop wanting every thing and get back to the basics. My grandfather use to tell me,(LIFE IS WHAT YOU MAKE OF IT. DON'T EXPECT THE GOVERMENT TO GET YOU OUT OF A JAM....GET YOURSELF OUT.) I have lived by these words for almost 25 years now, and still grateful for everything I have.

                                                        {"commentId":4153511,"threadId":"424215","contentId":"2132553","authorDomain":"btemple14"}
                                                          Reply#40 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:58 AM EST
                                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 ... 7
                                                          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"424215","isPrivate":false}
                                                          Leave a Comment:
                                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.