More news in MSNBC.com

What's the best solution to the foreclosure crisis?

advertisement
Ready To Join?

Newsvine is msnbc.com's social-news community where you can discuss stories, publish your own column, and connect with other news lovers.

Ready To Join?

Results with 119 short comments
Total of 11,323 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

14.1%
Let banks and homeowners work it out
1,595 votes
40.3%
Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans
4,564 votes
4.7%
Spend public money to save homes
531 votes
40.9%
Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay
4,633 votes
Display Comments:
Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

The loans that were made to people who could not pay need to be absorbed by the lender. Refinance good loans to lower interest.

{"commentId":5437055,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"magossen"}
  • 9 votes
 - 12:53 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

Market forces were interfered with getting us into this mess, let them work now to help get us out. No one is entitled to home ownership.

{"commentId":5437108,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"hanzak"}
  • 13 votes
 - 12:55 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

The market will take care of itself. We don't need more government intervention.

{"commentId":5437218,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"gregziglar"}
  • 11 votes
 - 12:59 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
Let banks and homeowners work it out

The government should send all the homeowners the $40 coupon for the digital converter too as an incentive for them to cancel their cable t

{"commentId":5437344,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"a-real-american-894640"}
     - 1:04 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
    Let banks and homeowners work it out

    this is an unfortuante situation that started with the Clinton Administration...it is similar to the internet boom gone ka-boom 8 years ago

    {"commentId":5437360,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"bwondergem"}
    • 3 votes
     - 1:04 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
    Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

    This whole mess could have been stopped two years ago when Hillary approached the Bush White House to freeze interest rates.

    {"commentId":5437497,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"axel000"}
    • 9 votes
     - Axel000
     - 1:09 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
    Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

    I am purchased a house early 2008 and its price is now dropping so fast. Will responsible buyers' loss be compensated as well?

    {"commentId":5437609,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"song-894669"}
    • 5 votes
     - 1:12 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
    Let banks and homeowners work it out

    I don't understand why banks don't help people stay in their homes & get paid something instead of nothing. Foreclosure doesn't help anyon

    {"commentId":5437658,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"classee55-1"}
    • 4 votes
     - 1:14 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
    Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

    Borrowers should be held 100% accountable and should have gotten a lawyer to review the terms for the most expensive purchase one makes.

    {"commentId":5437730,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"mlumia1"}
    • 9 votes
     - 1:17 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
    Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

    The solution is a combination of the four, individually any of these options will have a difficult time in succeeding.

    {"commentId":5437747,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"ramonmartorell"}
    • 1 vote
     - RamFla
     - 1:17 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
    Spend public money to save homes

    Or not and become the un-united states. By the way how is the war on terror going? Feel like winning? Or do you not see the connection?

    {"commentId":5437772,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"CanadianBlue"}
       - 1:18 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
      Let banks and homeowners work it out

      Increase the life span of the Mortgage along with lowering interest rate.

      {"commentId":5437995,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"raj-honnaya"}
      • 4 votes
       - 1:27 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
      Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

      not my problem you bought something you can't afford. I hate my new ford, maybe I should stop paying on that like people did on their homes

      {"commentId":5438161,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"normski"}
      • 11 votes
       - 1:32 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
      Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

      The people who are in trouble made foolish decisions based on greed. Let them learn the lesson and not do it again. No government bailout!

      {"commentId":5438353,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"tomjgallen"}
      • 13 votes
       - 1:39 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
      Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

      The market will work it all out in a year or two tops and then things will start to recover. No SPENDULUS package willmake a difference.

      {"commentId":5438432,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"jaqknife"}
         - 1:41 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
        Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

        why not reposses the homes - turn them into rentals and allow the current occupants to pay market value rent?

        this

        {"commentId":5438785,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"hyon-lew"}
        • 3 votes
         - accidie
         - 1:55 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
        Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

        How is there to be any help unless the way the credit industry scores debtors is examined and changed

        {"commentId":5438983,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"rahall"}
        • 3 votes
         - 2:02 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
        Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

        Rape Obama.
        Tar and feather hip.
        Then shoot him.

        {"commentId":5439027,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"megraham"}
           - 2:04 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
          Let banks and homeowners work it out

          Don't forclose move into and assume the loan of a lower valued home. Lock in interest rates at currant market levels.

          {"commentId":5439094,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"1jsp"}
          • 1 vote
           - 2:06 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
          Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

          Unregulated "market" forces bred greed that got us in this gully. Republicans: take a HIKE!

          {"commentId":5439185,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"davelja1"}
             - 2:10 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
            Spend public money to save homes

            This must be fixed, my property values have fallen 7,000.00 in one year! It's hurting everyone.

            {"commentId":5439281,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"Grannysue3085"}
            • 1 vote
             - 2:14 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
            Let the market work; foreclose on people who can’t pay

            They will not learn otherwise. Do NOT reward bad behavior. Rewarding them sends the message to others: Why pay when you can get it for free

            {"commentId":5439286,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"capn"}
            • 7 votes
             - Capn-1
             - 2:14 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
            Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

            for those who think that we should keep foreclosing-it lowers ALL of our home values when thousands of homes in your area are foreclosed on

            {"commentId":5439465,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"j-cogan"}
            • 2 votes
             - jjdcc
             - 2:20 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
            Spend public money to save homes

            Lenders cannot be trusted to modify on their own. Foreclosure is at the heart of our economic problems and must be fixed quickly.

            {"commentId":5439675,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"leprechaun1230"}
               - 2:27 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
              Pass laws forcing lenders to modify bad loans

              Lender GREED caused this mess and they should be forced to clean it up...no matter how much it costs them!!

              {"commentId":5440252,"threadId":"504555","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"scott-wellauer"}
              • 1 vote
               - 2:49 pm EST on Wed Feb 18, 2009
              advertisement

              Newsvine Discussion with 441 comments - Click here to jump to the comment form.

              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 13
              {"commentId":5436828,"authorDomain":"lazy2bytes"}

              Mr. President, You insisted on economic reform and accountablity. You limited your staff & their income just hours after your oath. Live what you preach! In Arizona, you talk about foreclosures and economic stability while staying at a resort in Paradise Valley. A resort that is above and beyond what is considered acceptable economically. It cost several thousands not hundreds. Is it beneath you to sleep in a room more economical or is it only your wife and staff that must tow the public agenda for economic reform. You gave us hope that we could be trust our country and leaders again. You are a man of great integrity and my President. I respect a man who admits his mistakes and reforms. Once is a mistake - twice is a habit. Attitude reflects Leadership for our country and its citizens. If change is truly here, it begins from the top down and the man reflected not only in the mirror but to those he leads. Lead by example publicly and privately. -Tammy B.

              {"commentId":5436828,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"lazy2bytes"}
              • 4 votes
              Reply#1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:46 PM EST
              {"commentId":5437213,"authorDomain":"chasyork"}

              Tammy, the resort is expensive, yes, but the problem is more one of Secret Service and prior administrations. Residences need vetted for security. Vetting takes money- often quite a bit more than the savings you'd get going somewhere else, so you stay in places that have already been cleared and are already familiar with the Secret Service... places used by prior administrations (given how new Obama's is)

              {"commentId":5437213,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"chasyork"}
              • 4 votes
              #1.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:59 PM EST
              {"commentId":5437351,"authorDomain":"gregziglar"}

              Then Obama shouldn't even be at any resort. For goodness sakes, my tax money is being used already to maintain a fantastic residence (The White House.)

              Isn't that good enough for any President? Why can't Obama vacation at Camp David? Why can't Obama NOT take a vacation for 4 years and work over the weekend (like millions of Americans.)

              Obama isn't going to walk the talk is he? NO, he's just like every other president, spending my tax money like water!

              I thought Obama was all about change. Nothing has changed. NOTHING.

              {"commentId":5437351,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"gregziglar"}
              • 2 votes
              #1.2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:04 PM EST
              {"commentId":5437683,"authorDomain":"marthadodd"}

              I did not vote for Obama, for he was trained by the best - his roommates in college were of Middle Eastern decent and he has been groomed year after year after year to do exactly what he is doing ----turning our country into a Socialist country. Are you really surprised or did you not do your homework? In the past week, he has flown to Florida, Colorado and Arizona. Don't they have cameras in DC to do his press conferences? Don't they have pens in DC so he can sign the biggest give away program with over $500 Billion in pork products. So glad ya'all voted him in to spend millions in Los Angeles to protect a specific mouse. You are such upstanding, learned citizens. Shame! Shame! Shame! Obama warned you he was about change and you did nothing about it. Now we all pay the price.

              {"commentId":5437683,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"marthadodd"}
              • 3 votes
              #1.3 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:15 PM EST
              {"commentId":5439506,"authorDomain":"njc1955"}

              And the trip on Air Force One to Il for Valentines? Sure they've all done it but it needs to stop with the one who promised change don't you think? Unless of course he paid the fuel bill.

              {"commentId":5439506,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"njc1955"}
              • 2 votes
              #1.4 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:21 PM EST
              {"commentId":5440428,"authorDomain":"jeff-58"}

              Give me a break, and get off your high horse.... Come one people.... He is the President of the United States of America, do you really expect him to stay at Motel 6? There are so many reasons that most people can't understand but are quick to point out their perceived flaws... You all act like you wouldn't do the same... Please...

              Jeff

              {"commentId":5440428,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"jeff-58"}
              • 3 votes
              #1.5 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:56 PM EST
              {"commentId":5441098,"authorDomain":"skipster56"}

              Best words used. "Practice what you preach." As far as the foreclosures? I'll post what I posted yesterday.

              Banks should take back the mortgage and keep the homeowners in them, and charge them ample rent, until the homeowners get back on their financial footing. Then mortgage them back to the homeowner at a 30 yr fixed rate, at the current market value. If the homeowners pay the rent on time, they get the deal. If they are unable to keep up on the rent, the foreclosure goes through because they can't afford the house in the first place. This is fair to everyone, including the banks and government and wouldn't cost anyone a dime. the bank, collecting rent, has money coming in and it would weed down the foreclosures to what is a normal amount for banks to contend with. It will also prove WHO can handle a mortgage.

              {"commentId":5441098,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"skipster56"}
              • 4 votes
              #1.6 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:20 PM EST
              {"commentId":5441982,"authorDomain":"dagah"}

              Yeah, right, head right on down to your local hotel with high security risks. What a grand (as I spread the sarcasm) idea!

              {"commentId":5441982,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"dagah"}
                #1.7 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:50 PM EST
                {"commentId":5442598,"authorDomain":"markeetta"}

                Every since this President has taken office, you people have taken the opportunity to bash him at every turn.  He seems to be trying to correct the mess the Republicans got us into. Some of the so called home owners have lost jobs and can no longer afford their homes.  Everyone is so critical of their fellor Americans on hard times.  Have you or would you in the past ask your president to say at a Holiday Inn, "NO"  He is the President of the United States and should stay some where safe for his protection.  You sound very stupid making such biased comments against your fellow Americans.

                {"commentId":5442598,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"markeetta"}
                • 4 votes
                #1.8 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:09 PM EST
                {"commentId":5444685,"authorDomain":"theOGlexie"}

                I think obama needs to tell michelle and the girls to get a party planned for the whole CREW to come thru!!! PARTY PARTY PARTY

                really, I think that sometimes we just need to stop and .......have a get-together :)

                i figured that made more sense to say seeing as EVERYTHING IS SO MESSED UP, PEOPLE - GOOD GRIEF!!! i surrender, man

                *throws arms up*

                {"commentId":5444685,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"theOGlexie"}
                  #1.9 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:18 PM EST
                  {"commentId":5444758,"authorDomain":"stevensrebra"}

                  You are just stupid

                  {"commentId":5444758,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"stevensrebra"}
                    #1.10 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:20 PM EST
                    {"commentId":5445106,"authorDomain":"theOGlexie"}

                    ahahahaha this is great. some people on here are comedy!

                    OH MR PRESIDENT..... I THOUGHT U'D WALK ON WATER.....WOE IS ME

                    please. get a clue. the country has done its'self in somewhat, but really, it's all sorts and circles of folks walking around doing their own, selfish, destructive acts to serve some out-of-wack purpose for something

                    sounds exactly like it is

                    we must all strive to examine ourselves first and foremost, for what others may or may not be involved in is the least of our concerns (or our business for that matter!) so rather than soliciting UR personal adVICES, kindly put ur own words into action. When u blame others and point ur finger, u have three fingers pointing back at U. food for thought.........eat up!

                    {"commentId":5445106,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"theOGlexie"}
                      #1.11 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:32 PM EST
                      {"commentId":5447656,"authorDomain":"tonyreeves"}

                      Tammie B?

                      You must be married David Duke.   I'm afraid it's true - girl.

                       

                      {"commentId":5447656,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"tonyreeves"}
                        #1.12 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:11 PM EST
                        {"commentId":5450654,"authorDomain":"captain-marvelous"}

                        My taxes are going up to pay for the bail out of people who shouldn't have gotten loans in the first place, but did thanks to Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

                        so what happens when I can no longer afford my home because Obama has taxed away all of my income, my retirement and my childrens' futures? China ain't buying any more debt from us.

                        You SUCK Obama!

                        {"commentId":5450654,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"captain-marvelous"}
                        • 2 votes
                        #1.13 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:36 PM EST
                        {"commentId":5453518,"authorDomain":"amylkravitz"}

                        What china is going to buy is....all of the real estate at below market value......Where will this leave Americans? Buying (or leasing) it back at outrageous prices later.

                        China already has scheduled group tours to do exactly that....buy cheap (foreclosed) real estate. doesn't anyone realize that this will give them!?

                        captain marvelous is right...what happens when i am taxed so much that i cant meet my financial obligations....please stop holding the government responsible(that only raises our taxes to pay for their "bailout". I would love to keep my families lifestyle or even better it....not pay for the average american idiots bailouts

                        {"commentId":5453518,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"amylkravitz"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #1.14 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:46 AM EST
                        {"commentId":5455646,"authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                        begins from the top down and the man reflected not only in the mirror but to those he leads

                        Eight wonderful years of W?

                        Ya'll folks get any further to the right your going to be living in Europe!

                        {"commentId":5455646,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                          #1.15 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:23 AM EST
                          {"commentId":5455709,"authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                          My taxes are going up to pay for the bail out of people who shouldn't have gotten loans in the first place, but did thanks to Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

                          And you would suggest more for the rich? tax breaks for Oil?

                          Why do you call yourself Captain Marvelous?

                          It seems to be everyones elses fault but yours, Captain.................(?).

                          Maybe, Captain Bush?

                          {"commentId":5455709,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                            #1.16 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:31 AM EST
                            {"commentId":5459840,"authorDomain":"schwannomin"}

                            Nobody's tax dollars are going to this, or any other, bailout in the near future. This is all deficit spending. People who buy treasury bonds are paying for this.

                            The funniest thing is the discussion was started with somebody complaining about the hotel the President is staying in. How remarkably ADHD do you have to be to focus on that rather than the SEVERE economic crisis we find ourselves in? Obviously, those worried about his hotel aren't being effected by the economic downturn.

                            {"commentId":5459840,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"schwannomin"}
                              #1.17 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:42 AM EST
                              {"commentId":5487749,"authorDomain":"xnalivs"}

                              Thanks for the sane response to an absurd posting, chas-894621. It is apparently so much easier for posters like Tammy B. to rant about the irrelevant and make sophomoric accusations than to understand the mess that Bush put this country into and understand how badly he broke it so we can start to fix it.

                              The posters failure to acknowledge you speak to the deeper issue - a profound partisan divide fueled by the Rupert Murdoch stranglehold on 40% of this country's media outlets.

                              And Murdoch is happy for Americans to "get used to a lower standard of living" as he called it over a year ago, since it lowers our wages to more closely match the global market and he gets even richer.

                              Get a clue, kids. We can't force adjustments in interest rates because no one knows who holds half of these mortgages now. They are bundled up into hundreds of thousands of financial instruments. The courts have already refused to take it on, anyway. We have to get the bad debt out of the market somehow.

                              You don't want to pay for it? Well, guess what. You already ARE paying for it! How much of your 401K did you lose? How far has the value of your home dropped?

                              And you can't put a blanket blame over the homeowners...how many were duped into buying ARMs because they were promised they would be able to refinance once they bought the house? How many can't pay now because they lost their jobs? How many can't sell because of the market? The deadbeats are in the small minority - I still rent, and I can deal with it. So, suck it up!

                              In addition to this mess, we are dealing with a national deficit that has doubled since 2001, increases to that deficit of $1 trillion a year from now on, the imminent collapse of our health care system, Bush-Cheney administration raids on the Social Security trust fund ($1 trillion!) that wiped it out and the potential for the US to default on its debt - the financial equivalent of a meteor hitting the planet. Don't take my word for it, read the US Treasury Financial Management Services report (12/13/2008) and look at some of their ten year charts.

                              For those of you who want to demonize Obama and make this his fault - wake t fu up! He has been in office a month. He is the only person on the planet who can possibly change what is starting to look like an inevitable global slide into anarchy. If you can't get behind him and support him, then get out of the way, because no matter what Fox News and Rupert Murdoch have to say about it, we are NOT going back to the ways that got us into this mess to begin with.

                              And no, it is not happening because of Clinton and the GSEs. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac worked fine for 40 years until the Republican Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed the regulations in the Glass-Steagall Act that separated banking and investment institutions and protected us from irresponsible capitalist greed.

                              After we invaded Iraq, Osama bin Laden released a tape announcing that all al Qaeda had to do was sit back and watch the US implode. If you can't get behind our President, then you might as well get used to the fact that al Qaeda has completely succeeded in their quest to see this country destroyed.

                              {"commentId":5487749,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"xnalivs"}
                              • 2 votes
                              #1.18 - Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:02 PM EST
                              {"commentId":5489101,"authorDomain":"bumpsy"}

                              Every word you just said is true.  I agree wholeheartedly.

                              {"commentId":5489101,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"bumpsy"}
                                #1.19 - Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:42 PM EST
                                {"commentId":5742077,"authorDomain":"lisa-49"}

                                GoneButNotForgotten: You make more sense than most folks in here. This should be mandatory reading for all!

                                {"commentId":5742077,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"lisa-49"}
                                  #1.20 - Wed Mar 4, 2009 5:43 PM EST
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":5436952,"authorDomain":"gailspecial"}

                                  I am SO against the modifying of the principal balance for distressed home owners.

                                  This is SO unfair to those of us who remained responsible and didnt buy more house than we could afford; didn't refinance for additional income; and read the contracts to make sure of the interest rate we were paying.

                                  I think it's fairer to all of us that those with high mortage rates can have their rates reset to say 6%.

                                  {"commentId":5436952,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"gailspecial"}
                                  • 5 votes
                                  Reply#2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:50 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":5437460,"authorDomain":"junque1mail"}

                                  I worked hard to make sure my credit was good enough to get a fixed 5.75% mortgage. Reset the mortgages to 4% for those of us with good payment history & equity, and 6-7% for those who are in bad loans.

                                  {"commentId":5437460,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"junque1mail"}
                                  • 2 votes
                                  #2.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:08 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":5437985,"authorDomain":"registerthis2"}

                                  I agree!  The honest people are getting the shaft while the low lifes get the gold mine.   Where's my mortgage relief?  Give the responsible hard working and retired people a new loan at a low government interest rate.

                                  {"commentId":5437985,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"registerthis2"}
                                  • 7 votes
                                  #2.2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:26 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":5438748,"authorDomain":"Luis-894792"}

                                  All,

                                  Have any of you considered the person who has owned homes for ove 40 years and has negver been unemployed for more than 2 months in 40 years AND has NEVER MISSED a single mortgage payment? A person that was making good money (more than enough to afford his current residence)? A person, who through no fault of his own, was laid-off (from a 20 year job) and is over 56 and black, in this economy? And cannot even get a single interview in 6 months? I have even tried to get lesser jobs - no good - the employers feel (and rightly so), that I am not a "keeper". I am a career software developer. Who is going to hire a "Quintessential Job Seeker"?

                                  My savings (over 6 months of living expenses) - gone.
                                  My 401K is next.
                                  Followed by credit cards - then what?

                                  Luis

                                  {"commentId":5438748,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"Luis-894792"}
                                    #2.3 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:54 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":5439964,"authorDomain":"mflynn01"}

                                    I am a homeowner and played by all the rules. I am a small business owner and played by all the rules. Now, I being told by this goverment, that to help out all the iresponsible dopes we all have to pay!!! And in the same breath we get slammed with bailing out GM and Chrysler. I never owned a Chrysler or a GM vehicle and never will as they are crap. GM and Chrysler made some real bad business decisions regarding the UAW and cannot be competitive in today's market. Let the market forces do what they do best and let things right themselves.

                                    The money used to bail out AIG should have been given to the taxpayers and AIG allowed to go belly-up. That cash infusion to the public would have already got this economy humming!!

                                    {"commentId":5439964,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"mflynn01"}
                                    • 4 votes
                                    #2.4 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:38 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":5441199,"authorDomain":"warrennikki"}

                                    The banks knew better and should not have given most of the sub-prime loans in the first place. While the borrower does shoulder responsibility for getting themselves into this mess, they went to the "experts" who told them they could afford way more than reasonable. Likewise, because the banks messed up, they should be held liable as well as the homeowners.

                                    It's a complex situation that seems to be over simplified much too often. If the borrower can afford the house with a reasonable interest rate, IMO the bank should be forced to renegotiate their mortgage for a lower rate. For those that bought way more house than they could afford, another solution, such as a short sale or foreclosure may be the only option. I also feel that banks should be forced to allow homeowners who have fallen behind catch up over time, instead of them not accepting any additional payments until the entire late amount is presented.

                                    However, the greedy banks screwed over their stockholders as well as their customers. I found it interesting that lawmakers did nothing about this mess until the stockholders were loosing money. Had they put a stop to this when the customers were being misled, it never would've gotten this far. Which makes me wonder if this is now a class issue.

                                    {"commentId":5441199,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"warrennikki"}
                                      #2.5 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:24 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":5441241,"authorDomain":"skipster56"}

                                      I totally agree. When you are distressed, you tighten your belt to get through it.. If the belt is tightened and you are unable to tighten it any more, you never will be able to afford the mortgage payment, even after help from the government. The biggest problem, I see, is the system they are putting in place is much like food stamps, welfare and the unemployment systems. They all want money, but the problem isn't they NEED more money. The problem is the systems have serious fraudulent leaks in them and need fixed. Pumping water into a pipe, with a leak, just loses the water and doesn't solve the problem.

                                      {"commentId":5441241,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"skipster56"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      #2.6 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:26 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":5442025,"authorDomain":"dagah"}

                                      This relief is LIMITED, folks. Here's the way to look at this--read about it first and then post. It's much more intelligent that way.

                                      {"commentId":5442025,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"dagah"}
                                      • 4 votes
                                      #2.7 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:51 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":5442078,"authorDomain":"bpinckney"}

                                      What about people who were responsible, but through no fault of their own have lost their jobs? There is only so much belt tightening you can do. Have a heart, people. You could be next.

                                      {"commentId":5442078,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"bpinckney"}
                                      • 3 votes
                                      #2.8 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:53 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":5443065,"authorDomain":"yeandels"}

                                      What happens to those individuals who again default on this modified mortgage? (Not those who lost their job - that's an entirely different issue and my sympathy to those enduring that stress). But it's a never-ending cycle of rewarding bad behavior.......Welcome to America......

                                      {"commentId":5443065,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"yeandels"}
                                        #2.9 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:25 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":5444856,"authorDomain":"rwilliamson-1"}

                                        It's really easy to lump everyone into the "loser" category. But, from everything that is coming to light lately, it appears that a large portion of the bad loans are a result of predatory lending practices, as well. Those individuals who borrowed to the hilt to "flip" a property and got caught, then I'm sorry but that was always the risk. You knew it when you walked into it.

                                        But, really, some folks aren't real bright (just read some of the posts here on Newsvine and you know what I mean) and they might not be able to smell a rat. The lending market went unchecked for several years passing out loans that didn't even require an income check. That alone should have been against the law. I'm a homeowner myself and seriously considered a refi that seemed to be too good to be true and I walked away. Too many people I know wouldn't have done so. It ain't illegal to be stupid, but it is illegal for the intelligent bankers to take advantage of them.

                                        {"commentId":5444856,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"rwilliamson-1"}
                                          #2.10 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:24 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":5455735,"authorDomain":"wmdavid"}

                                          This used to be for opinions, sounds like a bunch of people venting! 8)

                                          {"commentId":5455735,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                                            #2.11 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:34 AM EST
                                            {"commentId":5460073,"authorDomain":"schwannomin"}

                                            david:

                                            Most people don't understand what's going on well enough to actually form reasonable opinions. I blame our media for that, but also our President. It is his responsibility to be educator-in-chief. The speeches on this would be spectacularly boring, but people need to understand the severity of the situation.

                                            Odds are he's going to have to at least partially nationalize the banks at some point to force them to lend. We must avoid the very real possibility of massive risk taken by the public and any profit enjoyed solely by the corporations. The easiest way to get that to happen is temporary and (hopefully) partial nationalization. He better get the public educated on this possibility ASAP because if he doesn't, we are talking about a political firestorm that will benefit nobody.

                                            {"commentId":5460073,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"schwannomin"}
                                              #2.12 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:52 AM EST
                                              {"commentId":5470540,"authorDomain":"don-7"}

                                              OK, so some people borrowed more than they could afford, but what about good people that make their payments on time and have a 6.75% mortgage that was a good rate at the time they purchased? Now, they can't refinance to a better rate because their house won't appraise for enough due to the declining market. Why can't they be allowed to refinance WITHOUT an appraisal? If they are making their payments in a timely fashion, why can't THEY get a bail out that doesn't cost anyone anything? They already owe more than the house is worth, so what is the harm in giving them a better rate and allowing THEM to take advantage of the better interest rates? Gee, more money in the pockets of responsible people? Wonder what would happen to the economy? This isn't rocket science here folks!

                                              {"commentId":5470540,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"don-7"}
                                                #2.13 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:47 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":5487896,"authorDomain":"xnalivs"}

                                                cube3u, EXCELLENT advice!!! Too bad most of the people on the board and in the country won't take it.

                                                {"commentId":5487896,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"xnalivs"}
                                                  #2.14 - Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:06 PM EST
                                                  Reply
                                                  {"commentId":5436970,"authorDomain":"lilgolfer"}

                                                  the sooner the bad debt is acknowledged the sooner the problem can be resolved. give the incentives to investors willing to accept risk, rather than reinvesting in hi risk situations. you can remove a band aid quickly or slowly...it hurts either way!

                                                  {"commentId":5436970,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"lilgolfer"}
                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  Reply#3 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:50 PM EST
                                                  {"commentId":5437037,"authorDomain":"tandmkelly"}

                                                  Mark Haynes at CNBC said it best this morning. We just taught a whole generation of Americans that it is ok to over extend yourself. The government will alsways come to your rescue.

                                                  {"commentId":5437037,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"tandmkelly"}
                                                    Reply#4 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:53 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5437085,"authorDomain":"vedovitch"}

                                                    Why should people who have refinanced their homes from $250,000 and $400,000 (Southern California) to up to $1,000,000 to live the good life and now want to be bailed out because they are under water as they now own more than the home is worth.

                                                    {"commentId":5437085,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"vedovitch"}
                                                    • 6 votes
                                                    Reply#5 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:54 PM EST
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":5437102,"authorDomain":"mrwill"}

                                                    My wife and I worked our a**es to death to pay our mortgage off and saved very little money along the way. Now we are both in our 60s and you expect us to pay for someone else's mortgage? We are trying to save for our old age (which is already here) who is going to help us?

                                                    We should have never paid off our mortgage and simply looked for others to help us out. Maybe I can take out a mortgage and not make any payments and wait for Obama to ride in on a white horse!

                                                    {"commentId":5437102,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"mrwill"}
                                                    • 5 votes
                                                    Reply#6 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:55 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5439955,"authorDomain":"hanzak"}

                                                    I am with you brother. The folks who have shown responsibility and maintained a lifestyle consistent with their means are the ones getting screwed in this deal.

                                                    {"commentId":5439955,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"hanzak"}
                                                    • 4 votes
                                                    #6.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:37 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5440676,"authorDomain":"tmilliken"}

                                                    I agree -- my husband and I are 5 months shy of paying off our mortgage -- trying to save for retirement and with this market it doesn't look good. Instead of mortgage relief for irresponsible individuals, where is my "retirement" relief. Can I get the same help that people get on their mortgages but apply it to our retirement.

                                                    What happened to home ownership in the Great Depression -- did those homeowners get bailed out -- not according to my 84 year old mother! Their family lost everything and they didn't get any handouts.

                                                    If you can't afford the mortgage start renting.

                                                    {"commentId":5440676,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"tmilliken"}
                                                    • 3 votes
                                                    #6.2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:04 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5441095,"authorDomain":"sherriekevin-2"}

                                                    I agree with you. Someone needs to tell Obama that the United States is not Disneyworld. Not all dreams come true. Just because a person dreams of owning a home does not mean that the rest of the country should be required to finance it. This is just another slap in the faces of those of us who work and pay our bills on time.

                                                    {"commentId":5441095,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"sherriekevin-2"}
                                                    • 4 votes
                                                    #6.3 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:20 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5442236,"authorDomain":"bpinckney"}

                                                    We don't always like where our tax dollars go. I don't like paying a trillion dollars for an unnecessary war, but I am.

                                                    Its so easy to point the finger of blame and say "its their fault." And yes, in some cases it is. But not all cases. There are many, many people who have been caught in the downward economic spiral through no fault of their own. I see nothing wrong with helping them, because as other posters here have pointed out, when there are a lot of foreclosures housing values fall. And yes, that could mean YOUR house.

                                                    {"commentId":5442236,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"bpinckney"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #6.4 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:57 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5446862,"authorDomain":"jason012"}

                                                    Barbara, then lets help those people with extended unemployment benefits. But as a Southern California renter where home prices are still grossly overinflated (about 40% looking at the Case-Shiller indices), I find it a crime to use my hard earned tax dollars to subsidize a primary mortgage reduction for a greedy person, or ignorant person, who bought a home at a price they can't responsibly afford.

                                                    Not only are they using my money to give those "irresponsible" mortgage holders a retro-active discount on their homes (where is the $100k-$200k discount for me), but they are using my money to freeze me out of the housing market by propping up the overinflated prices and not allowing the free market to work and correct the 300% bubble.

                                                    {"commentId":5446862,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"jason012"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #6.5 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:39 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5454804,"authorDomain":"avanti-1"}

                                                    I'm 62 and my wife of 32 yrs is 59. We paid off our 30 mortage 4 yr ago. A little over a year ago we took out a six figure construction loan and had a house built on 35 acres we've had for 30 years. We hope to sell our first place to help with the new house. I haven't been able to work because of health reasons for the last 25 years. We haven't even tried to get any financial help from the gov't. Obama is one of the many that were pushing for house loans to people who had no way to pay for them. Besides people buying houses just to re-sell, many builders went into dept building houses and condiminiums that either were never finished or never sold. Now we have a gov't that is being run by someone who the media, Hollywood, and Opra put in office. It won't be long untill we have to hand over the deed to the United States to it's communist lenders, that our gov't helped industrialize.

                                                    {"commentId":5454804,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"avanti-1"}
                                                      #6.6 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:09 AM EST
                                                      {"commentId":5455806,"authorDomain":"wmdavid"}

                                                      Hows you retirement package doing, Bill? Is there any left? Hows your return? You part of the Madoff thing or the scheme in Texas?

                                                      Yep, its been a free market, if you work for wall street or the banks.

                                                      The one good thing is I have stopped getting the constant calls about refinancing and the pre-approved s**t has all but stopped.

                                                      Thanks, righties.

                                                      8)

                                                      {"commentId":5455806,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                                                        #6.7 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:41 AM EST
                                                        {"commentId":5455837,"authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                                                        I haven't been able to work because of health reasons for the last 25 years.

                                                        And you were able to get a 6 figure loan??

                                                        Geezus. Point in question, answered.

                                                        8)

                                                        {"commentId":5455837,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
                                                          #6.8 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:44 AM EST
                                                          {"commentId":5470663,"authorDomain":"don-7"}

                                                          yeah, and no "lefties" invested in the greedy market? Just ask Pelosi, Reid, Frank and Obama about their home loan rates that were under market price when they got them. This problem was created by people of ALL political persuasions. When we stop pointing fingers, just maybe then we can get something done to turn this country around! We spend more time complaining about "who" did or didn't what then we do trying to address the problem. Hell, we even spend precious tax dollars and time chasing freaking steriod using athletes!! I mean, come on, the econmy is going down the toilet and we actually care about "boys" playing games unfairly???

                                                          {"commentId":5470663,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"don-7"}
                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #6.9 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:54 PM EST
                                                          {"commentId":5482279,"authorDomain":"kclouser"}

                                                          I agree that we who continue to make our payments on our debts should not have our taxes used to bail out the stupid idiots who can not read documents or who are so dumbe they don't understand adjustable rates.

                                                          {"commentId":5482279,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"kclouser"}
                                                            #6.10 - Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:49 AM EST
                                                            {"commentId":5488112,"authorDomain":"xnalivs"}

                                                            Good for you. Now, can we talk about reality? It is limited relief, with many strings attached. Read the proposal first. We have to get the bad debt out of the market and give help to people who no longer have the opportunity to work their a**es off thanks to the corporate greed that ruined our economy. You and I are going to pay one way or the other, either through a continued global financial disaster that will put us in a hole so deep we will never come out, or through this plan and the help that Obama offers.

                                                            {"commentId":5488112,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"xnalivs"}
                                                              #6.11 - Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:13 PM EST
                                                              Reply
                                                              {"commentId":5437183,"authorDomain":"mmays-1"}

                                                              we are getting to involve in this @!$%#. the bank cause all of this and now let them get the house. they deserved this.

                                                              {"commentId":5437183,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"mmays-1"}
                                                                Reply#7 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:57 PM EST
                                                                {"commentId":5437221,"authorDomain":"rcrfwt"}

                                                                I do not know that it would be the best, however my first choice would be to let the banks and home owners work it out till the end.

                                                                There are plenty of Americans out there with money problems other than homes. Where does the Government stop? Who is the last guy for the Government to help? Or better yet, who is the first guy the Government let go down the drain?

                                                                The People in trouble were nothing more than GREEDING! They were looking to make the "easy dollar" and lost, so be it.

                                                                So now the guy that will loose his job, his car, and his home from the Problem caused by these greeding people will get nothing.

                                                                {"commentId":5437221,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"rcrfwt"}
                                                                  Reply#8 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:59 PM EST
                                                                  {"commentId":5440006,"authorDomain":"bradswife"}

                                                                  Not everyone in trouble with their mortgage was greedy. You are lumping everyone into a group unfairly. Many were duped (see yesterday's article about the guy where twice his signature was forged on loan documents), and many are in their situation because they have lost their job(s) or due to sudden medical expenses or all of the above and more legitimate reasons. Not everyone was greedy, but those who were deserve nothing but foreclosure.

                                                                  {"commentId":5440006,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"bradswife"}
                                                                    #8.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:39 PM EST
                                                                    {"commentId":5440586,"authorDomain":"audirae1"}

                                                                    My husband and I built our own house in 2007. The bank said they would give us 200,000.00 dollars. I was responsible, did the math, no flippin way! We could not have bought groceries. The bank was wrong, I was smart. We did not borrow more than what we could afford if my husband were to loose his job. BAM, laid off. We struggle but we still have our house. Now I have to help the people who were not smart enough to pull out a calculator, plan for the future and that have a home way nicer than the one I have! Bull#$&*!

                                                                    {"commentId":5440586,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"audirae1"}
                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    #8.2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:02 PM EST
                                                                    {"commentId":5441419,"authorDomain":"skipster56"}

                                                                    Plain Sense. I somewhat disagree with your statement. Then guy who had his signatures forged is not in the category needing money to help. If that is his REAL problem, why is he in a house? And if he is, why does he not get a real estate lawyer to help him instead of the government. That situation has a lot of holes in it. Sorry.

                                                                    {"commentId":5441419,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"skipster56"}
                                                                      #8.3 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:32 PM EST
                                                                      {"commentId":5441528,"authorDomain":"skipster56"}

                                                                      pattyo We aren't talking about President Bush here. We are talking about a President that is preaching one thing and doing another. If you think that is good government, then you simply don't understand.

                                                                      {"commentId":5441528,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"skipster56"}
                                                                        #8.4 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:35 PM EST
                                                                        {"commentId":5441565,"authorDomain":"pparkerze"}

                                                                        If.. and really if.. people were duped and some one forged a name on documents or things were done with a mortgage that were shady and people new nothing about it, then maybe i feel sorry for them and something should be done. But.. most are people that get into a home that is way too expensive and now the bills have piled up... doesnt matter how, medical bills, lost jobs, whatever. Should have thought about those things before they purchased their home. My gosh, i think about those things before i buy a car... for a 6 year loan.. much less a home that i may have to pay for for 30 years.

                                                                        {"commentId":5441565,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"pparkerze"}
                                                                          #8.5 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:37 PM EST
                                                                          {"commentId":5458526,"authorDomain":"gregziglar"}

                                                                          All UAW workers who have big houses they can't afford have truly hit the welfare jackpot. Their pensions are guaranteed (via my tax dollars), their health care is guaranteed (via my tax dollars) and their big houses will be paid for by me (via my tax dollars.)

                                                                          Could someone just tell me why UAW workers are so special? Just curious.

                                                                          {"commentId":5458526,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"gregziglar"}
                                                                            #8.6 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:43 AM EST
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            {"commentId":5437260,"authorDomain":"orhuuu"}

                                                                            The CEOs of the Big 3 American auto manufacturers were rightfully critized for flying to Washington D.C. in corporate jets. Yet our president can fly in a jumbo jet first to Denver to sign a bill into law and then to Phoenix to deliver a speech. Both the signing and the speech could have been done in the White House, which is provided to the president at the taxpayers" expense. The arrogance of the ploy staggers and saddens one.

                                                                            {"commentId":5437260,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"orhuuu"}
                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            Reply#9 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:00 PM EST
                                                                            {"commentId":5439267,"authorDomain":"patandjacko"}

                                                                            Good grief people............give this president a break. Is he supposed to stay in a 6 Motel and fly commercial? Where were you people when Bush was commutting to his Texas ranch on a regular basis. This man is trying to solve a boat load of problems he inherited from the last administration. Either we all stand behind him or we will all go down the tubes. He is trying to help us.

                                                                            {"commentId":5439267,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"patandjacko"}
                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            #9.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:13 PM EST
                                                                            {"commentId":5440133,"authorDomain":"bradswife"}

                                                                            Security, security, security. Duh. That plane is secure and ALL presidents, current and former who are living still, require the best security we can provide. Even so, in spite of our best efforts in the past we still have managed to lose a few to assassins. Not providing for the security of the President is just not acceptable. Period.

                                                                            And, as for flying around the country to do his job, I like that he's showing us he's not all about Washington. Past presidents (and other public officials) seem to have lost themselves, and lost touch with the reality of their constituency, by confining themselves to that scene. I say, keep moving around the country and know who and what you are governing!

                                                                            {"commentId":5440133,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"bradswife"}
                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                            #9.2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:45 PM EST
                                                                            {"commentId":5742334,"authorDomain":"lisa-49"}

                                                                            JohnRiley: How can you even compare the two? Obama, like it or not, is President. He benefits from AirForceOne just like all Presidents before him. On the other hand, the Big3 CEO's flew to Washington, in those luxuriously appointed private jets, with their fat greedy hands out for Taxpayer money since they mishandled what they had. They have been making money hand over fist on car sales for years. Competition is fierce with all the foreign cars on the market. Maybe they should learn to get lean and mean.

                                                                            {"commentId":5742334,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"lisa-49"}
                                                                              #9.3 - Wed Mar 4, 2009 5:55 PM EST
                                                                              Reply
                                                                              {"commentId":5437285,"authorDomain":"gregziglar"}

                                                                              I can't even afford a house and the government is going to use my tax money to pay other people's mortgage!

                                                                              I am very very upset about this. I work hard and save money and pinch pennies and eat ramen noodles and pay all my bills on time. Why do I now have to pay other people's bills?

                                                                              {"commentId":5437285,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"gregziglar"}
                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              Reply#10 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:01 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":5442556,"authorDomain":"bpinckney"}

                                                                              you people are really shortsighted and don't know how the economy works if you can't see how allowing all of these houses to go into foreclosure will impact the economy including housing values (yes, your house) and the availability of credit.

                                                                              {"commentId":5442556,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"bpinckney"}
                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #10.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:08 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":5458539,"authorDomain":"gregziglar"}

                                                                              Barbara, all of these houses AREN"T going into foreclosure. And so what if they do? I can buy one at a good price!

                                                                              {"commentId":5458539,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"gregziglar"}
                                                                                #10.2 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:43 AM EST
                                                                                Reply
                                                                                {"commentId":5437370,"authorDomain":"magossen"}

                                                                                The lenders of the bad mortgages should have to absorb the loss. Allow refinancing of good mortgages and allow new loans to people that can actually pay a monthly mortgage. This will put more money into the economy. The financial sector was at fault in loaning to every tom, dick and harry even if they were a bad credit risk. I did not approve any bad loans and I don't want to pay for their supidity.....

                                                                                {"commentId":5437370,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"magossen"}
                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                Reply#11 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:05 PM EST
                                                                                {"commentId":5441727,"authorDomain":"skipster56"}

                                                                                Whenever there is a problem, the best way to fix it is to go back to the root of the problem. When President Clinton told Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac they needed to start approving mortgages for people with lower incomes and lower credit scores, why didn't the CEO tell President Clinton it was a very bad idea and it would damage the economy in years to come? Every CEO that deals with the President can say NO. There is no such thing as "NO Prison" The problem lies in the fact that the CEO gained something for what he did. saying "Yes Mr President." He was appointed to President Clinton's Cabinet. So, What I am saying, Go back to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and let them pay for the mistake. If they are unable to correct their mistake, do away with them. After all, when you make a mistake, who pays?

                                                                                {"commentId":5441727,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"skipster56"}
                                                                                  #11.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:42 PM EST
                                                                                  {"commentId":5455589,"authorDomain":"pusscat"}

                                                                                  Leave it to a Repub to keep this crap flowing. Banks were redlining neighborhoods. Some banks in the south wouldn't approve a black family that wanted (AND could afford) to move into a white neighborhood. FHA loans were introduced for people who could afford payments, but couldn't come up with the 20%. I have an FHA, so I do know. I STILL had to prove income, I had to prove that I could afford the monthly payments. I only put 5% down. FIND the specific statute that demanded that loans were made to people with no income or illegals. It doesn't exist. There was no provision for people that couldn't afford the payments. The law was introduced to provide for anyone that COULD afford it wouldn't be turned away. Try reading something other then Rush or Fox for a change.

                                                                                  {"commentId":5455589,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"pusscat"}
                                                                                    #11.2 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:14 AM EST
                                                                                    Reply
                                                                                    {"commentId":5437373,"authorDomain":"rsrypk"}

                                                                                    It appears the Democratic Party Leader's have pumped enough fear into every aspect of the economy as to compel everyone to get on board or the end of the world is eminent.. This president's campaign PROMISED "Transparency" and "Change we can believe in." The only thing I've seen is an unquenchable arrogance and hypocrisy to match. Once the ink dries on this Bailout Bill and Pelosi, Geithner, Reid and Frank get to the trough, tens if not hundreds of BILLIONS will disappear and by the time it's discovered, if it every is, another administration will face the task of trying to right the ship.

                                                                                    I'm tired of all the BS that is spewed each and everyday by our so called leaders in Washington. The only thing I see coming from this Bailout nonsense is more spending of MY Hard Earned Dollars without any intelligent representation in my district or in Washington. I'm sure all these incredibly superior architect's of this Bailout Bill believe they are doing what is right ; What I see is a collective body of pathological liars. The only difference between these politician's and the victim's of Madoff's ponsi scheme are his victims sought him out and threw their money at him. We on the other hand are being sold a bill of goods without even having seen what's in the BILL.

                                                                                    {"commentId":5437373,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"rsrypk"}
                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                    Reply#12 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:05 PM EST
                                                                                    {"commentId":5441391,"authorDomain":"rettxvet"}

                                                                                    Thank God that we are not dependent on on whiners like PKLINKE to help us out of this mess. Where, in all your ranting, is your suggested solution to the problem. You say "The only thing I've seen is an unquenchable arrogance and hypocrisy to match". Please throw your redneck tantrums in the privacy of your own asylum.

                                                                                    {"commentId":5441391,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"rettxvet"}
                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                    #12.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:31 PM EST
                                                                                    {"commentId":5441878,"authorDomain":"pmaes"}

                                                                                    You seem to ignore the fact that this problem started during the republicans tour of duty. Paulson, who used to be part of Wall Street, and the Bush administration are the ones who pumped fear into everyone. The bailouts and rescue packages started before Obama and have not been handled very well and have not been successful. Stop with the republican penchant for blaming democrats for problems created by republicans. The republican congressional and senate representativesare that have suddenly discovered the word no are at the root of our current problems.

                                                                                    In 2001 Bush was handed a 5.6 trillion budget surplus. At the end of 2008 over 6 trillion dollars were added to the national debt with deficits and some of the bailout money already appropriated. Any additional bailout money will be because of the policies of republicans.

                                                                                    And the last point is, stop wining about your hard earned dollars being spent on bailouts. Your money is not being spent, it's future generations money being spent. we are not even paying for Iraq with our money.

                                                                                    {"commentId":5441878,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"pmaes"}
                                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                                    #12.2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:47 PM EST
                                                                                    {"commentId":5442051,"authorDomain":"skipster56"}

                                                                                    My wife and I are both Republicans that voted for President Obama. We can no longer agree with his method of changes he promised. We put a lot of thought in voting for him and the change that was needed, but it appears he is showing his inexperience in spending "True Americans" money. We voted, the way we did, because we are financially secure and no President will alter our lifestyle of living, as the economy won't. We, thought, we were making the right decision at the time. We won't make that mistake again. I was a Democrat when Carter was President and owned a business. My employee quarterly tax jumped from $345 per quarter to over $1400 per quarter with the same number of employees I always had. President Obama is sitting himself up for failure, but I see the media protecting him, but it will be what is called a "media bubble" It will burst as the real estate bubble burst. It can only continue for so long. Inexperience always shows, no matter who it is or what the job is. Everyone knows that, especially the inexperienced person. Sorry to say we voted for him. Too late now. Our stupid mistake.

                                                                                    {"commentId":5442051,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"skipster56"}
                                                                                      #12.3 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:52 PM EST
                                                                                      {"commentId":5442805,"authorDomain":"markeetta"}

                                                                                      Then next time don't vots. You people make me sick. You think that America is your America. It is all of ours. This President has been in office for less than 30 days and has tried to make changes to get people on the right track. You are all unappreciative and probably you sorry you lost your savings on the Rebublican watch. Give this man a chance. My predication is that a lot of you will have to pull that foot out of your mouths when relief comes for us all based on the correct decisions the president is trying to make.

                                                                                      {"commentId":5442805,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"markeetta"}
                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                      #12.4 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:16 PM EST
                                                                                      {"commentId":5447018,"authorDomain":"mj-tyler"}

                                                                                      markeeta; you are sick , it was a repub pres. with a demo congress. your fever must be clouding your mind,for anyone to think a solution to this could be had in 30 days is insane

                                                                                      {"commentId":5447018,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"mj-tyler"}
                                                                                        #12.5 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:46 PM EST
                                                                                        {"commentId":5457688,"authorDomain":"kelleys-1"}

                                                                                        Ah, Markeetta...it is easy to see that you are currently, or will be soon, a recipient of the redistribution of wealth that President Obama so eloquently stated was a policy agenda of his. The stimulus plan is filled with redistributing the wealth plans. Send the money to those places supported by his biggest campaign contributors and democratic brothers & sisters. Send the money to cities for Urban renewal, so inner city African American youth can decorate it with beautiful artwork. The foreclosure bailout is another distribution of wealth plan that will assist those who can't afford their homes. It is not for all homeowners with poor mortgages, only those who are financed through Freddie and Fannie...hmm...wasn't the CEO's of these companies big campaign supporters of the President? What about those financed through other companies? Sorry, not much help here, if you were capable of getting a mortgage through another source then you weren't poor, downtroddened, and ignorant and your wealth is needed to complete the redistribution. I am sure that I will be labeled racist, as that is always the comment when the truth is laid out, but the truth is that Obama hates white people and he is redistributioning our wealth to those who were never given their 40 acres and a mule.

                                                                                        {"commentId":5457688,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"kelleys-1"}
                                                                                          #12.6 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:59 AM EST
                                                                                          Reply
                                                                                          {"commentId":5437459,"authorDomain":"Jazz-894650"}

                                                                                          In addition, these families may spend again, and studies show they will because they have not learned the fundamentals of budgeting. We will have to bail them out again, in the future, to save the economy.

                                                                                          {"commentId":5437459,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"Jazz-894650"}
                                                                                            Reply#13 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:08 PM EST
                                                                                            {"commentId":5437510,"authorDomain":"craig-23"}

                                                                                            Lender greed has caused and continues to cause many of these Foreclosure problems. Had they simply realized that its better to lose a little bit, renegotiate the loans that a re "saveable", and liquidate the ones that are not, the housing market would get cleaned up quicker than otherwise, and without the Government getting involved. Now that the Government is involved, things will probably be slow and painful. Sure people will be helped. The issue though, is it never should have come to this, and the fault mostly is with the lenders for being greedy.

                                                                                            {"commentId":5437510,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"craig-23"}
                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                            Reply#14 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:09 PM EST
                                                                                            {"commentId":5438413,"authorDomain":"patricia-crisp"}

                                                                                            I agree 100%.

                                                                                            {"commentId":5438413,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"patricia-crisp"}
                                                                                              #14.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:41 PM EST
                                                                                              Reply
                                                                                              {"commentId":5437523,"authorDomain":"Fritzy"}

                                                                                              Amazing, let me see if I understand this. If I took out a loan at 100% financing on a property at an inflated value, the market turns, my house is now worth less than the 100% value I financed and the government will take care of what I am upside down in a Bankruptcy. BRILLIANT, now tell me what happens when the bankruptcy is over and values rise above the level they were when they were renegotiated in the BK. I now have built in equity in my property. Why would you pay your mortgage? It is a shame my house is paid off, because I did what was supposed to be done, now I get nothing but the privilege to help those who were irresponsible. Hey my 401K dropped 50% but the values of the stocks and mutual funds I had were overvalued and now I am underwater BAIL ME OUT!!!!!!!

                                                                                              {"commentId":5437523,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"Fritzy"}
                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                              Reply#15 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:10 PM EST
                                                                                              {"commentId":5437552,"authorDomain":"buzz-mackay"}

                                                                                              All I can say is why Tim Geithner could not present and articulate policy with details when given the chance. Obama's team should be pleased with this well layed out structured plan. The only question mark is there is no requirement for lenders to rewrite. THe lender will be the ultimate arbiter and will no doubt be more interested in rewrites based on their bottom line and not on the bottom line of the borrower.

                                                                                              {"commentId":5437552,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"buzz-mackay"}
                                                                                                Reply#16 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:11 PM EST
                                                                                                {"commentId":5437555,"authorDomain":"animator86"}

                                                                                                The problem with Obama's plan to keep real estate prices high is that the real estate prices are too high. To pay for a house, one has to maintain a high-paying job for 30 to 40 years. Who can even maintain a good job or even good health for that long? Most owners will eventually default. The other problem is that elevated real estate prices make American businesses less competetive as their costs escalate, keeping in mind that employees have to be paid more just to rent. So businesses go under when competing with foreign businesses.

                                                                                                The banks artificially increased the home values with the crazy loans and so we are now slaves. We must work hard for the rest of our live just to own a home, or to pay a landlord's mortgage. Thus, banks or landlords own us. Therefore, the economic recovery can only occur if mortgages and real estate prices drop to 35% the current values.

                                                                                                {"commentId":5437555,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"animator86"}
                                                                                                  Reply#17 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:11 PM EST
                                                                                                  {"commentId":5438451,"authorDomain":"smauer56"}

                                                                                                  My husband and myself have also been in the same house for nearly 15 years and have paid our mortgage on time but we now have 2 to 3 homes in the area that are in foreclosure and have brought the value of other homes in the neighborhood down. Our area is no where near as devasted as other parts of the country. I believe that not all the homeowners were greedy, but were taken advantage of by so-called loan originators (salesmen) who were feeding a neverending need for new "mortgages" to package & sell on the open market. Somehow regulation was lax and documentation that was previously required to prove something as simple as income was no longer needed to approve any and all homeowners who were either buying or refinancing. I continue to believe that some but not all the people who are now in trouble were greedy - maybe naive.

                                                                                                  {"commentId":5438451,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"smauer56"}
                                                                                                    #17.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:42 PM EST
                                                                                                    Reply
                                                                                                    {"commentId":5437604,"authorDomain":"rdavidson51"}

                                                                                                    It would be nice to let the banks and home owners work this out. But what about the mortgage brokers who omitted telling the home owners all the facts or talked them into borrowing more so they would get a bigger commission? What about the brokers who falsified documents and had friends give inflated appraisals to get the loans to go through? Then we have the next tier of bankers who knew the applications were suspect but looked the other way so they could make a profit. How do we make these profiteers pay for what they have done to country?

                                                                                                    Maybe we should get the former President Bush and Congressmen who agreed to take funds from the SEC and use the money for other things instead of hiring more investigators to keep an eye on Wall street to pay for the mess they help to create.

                                                                                                    Bob Davidson

                                                                                                    {"commentId":5437604,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"rdavidson51"}
                                                                                                      Reply#18 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:12 PM EST
                                                                                                      {"commentId":5498501,"authorDomain":"lauriee"}

                                                                                                      we agree with you... What do you think about renting the home you live in , when you can,t afford a mortgage,or having a mortgage company, finding another foreclosure that you can afford,Making one foreclosure,instead of two...Trading one for another....

                                                                                                      {"commentId":5498501,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"lauriee"}
                                                                                                        #18.1 - Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:06 PM EST
                                                                                                        Reply
                                                                                                        {"commentId":5437607,"authorDomain":"snicksic"}

                                                                                                        Here's the problem in Phoenix. Many people are lured to the Valley of the Sun because of the sunshine and warm weather. When they get here they find that there is a price for the sunshine. Earnings and benefits aren't the same as the union jobs they lost in the rust belt and the cost of living is a bit higher. Out of every 5 people who attempt to relocate here, 3 will leave. That means that housing will turn over at a fast rate. If you can't sell your house for what you owe, you walk away. There are too many people out here looking to relocate, not modify. For those that bought their houses durning the investor feeding frenzy in the last couple of years, they are probably hopelessly negative in their mortgages. In my established neighborhood in Mesa, the 33 homes that make up this small neighborhood of what was a year ago $300-350,000 homes have dropped over $100,000 in value. The neighborhood lost some $3.7 million alone. Most have been here a while, have normal prime mortgages, and have seen every bit of equity they had in their homes dissappear. If they need to sell, considering the cost of sales, it would probably be beneficial for some to just walk away.

                                                                                                        I don't see anything in Obama's plan that would attempt to protect equity of these people who did nothing wrong but their house value has dropped. I believe it would be better if he attempted to force lenders not to sell foreclosed homes for less than what is owed on their total debt on the property. This would at least put a bottom on these declining values. We're not looking for lower rates, we're looking for value protection.

                                                                                                        Steve

                                                                                                        Mesa, Arizona

                                                                                                        {"commentId":5437607,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"snicksic"}
                                                                                                          Reply#19 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:12 PM EST
                                                                                                          {"commentId":5439098,"authorDomain":"dpsams"}

                                                                                                          A year ago the homes in your neighborhood were overpriced. If those houses were purchased prior to the "boom" the owners might actually have some equity. If not, that "equity" was simply a "paper asset" based on speculative valuation.

                                                                                                          {"commentId":5439098,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"dpsams"}
                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                          #19.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:06 PM EST
                                                                                                          {"commentId":5440279,"authorDomain":"snicksic"}

                                                                                                          prices are now matching what they were some 10 years ago. There is very little equity left in many of these homes. The ones bought during the boom are hopelessly negative.

                                                                                                          {"commentId":5440279,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"snicksic"}
                                                                                                            #19.2 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:50 PM EST
                                                                                                            {"commentId":5442362,"authorDomain":"skipster56"}

                                                                                                            What I am going to do is what a lot of financial secure people do in times likes these. Purchase more properties, because we can afford it, and the market values will go up agian. It's no different than buying gold. You wait for the price to drop then buy. I know you can buy properties for pennies on the dollar right now. We have bids on an apartment complex and 3 other homes right now. This has always been going on and it always will. Out of the new economy landscape forming, there will become some real estate moguls and I hope I am there. After all, We lived the way you were suppose to live. Within your means.

                                                                                                            {"commentId":5442362,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"skipster56"}
                                                                                                              #19.3 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:01 PM EST
                                                                                                              Reply
                                                                                                              {"commentId":5437627,"authorDomain":"cr250r79"}

                                                                                                              So I was stupid when I refinanced for a lower rate a few years ago and they BEGGED me to take out all my "equity" but I refused? They said the home I built for $125,000 in '95 on 2 1/2 acres was then (2006) worth $450,000 and that I was silly not to "use" that bonus equity. I told them I would be stupid to take out that amount, as I would then still HAVE TO PAY IT BACK at a much higher payment. Boy, I guess I was I stupid. Should have done it, then fell behind, and let the Democrats save me from myself. I could have bought a lot of toys with that extra $325,000 and now I could still keep them and let the American taxpayer foot my bill. Will this country never return to common sense and a feeling of personal responsibility for decisions and choices? Apparently not...with libs, the only ones who need to exercise self-control are the ones paying for those who cannot.

                                                                                                              {"commentId":5437627,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"cr250r79"}
                                                                                                                Reply#20 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:13 PM EST
                                                                                                                {"commentId":5438267,"authorDomain":"john-69"}

                                                                                                                You are sooooo right dc. Congratulations on being smart. I appreciate common sense.

                                                                                                                {"commentId":5438267,"threadId":"504552","contentId":"2449146","authorDomain":"john-69"}
                                                                                                                  #20.1 - Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:36 PM EST
                                                                                                                  Reply
                                                                                                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 13
                                                                                                                  {"canLink":false,"threadId":"504552","isPrivate":false}
                                                                                                                  Leave a Comment:
                                                                                                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.