Today Show Home
Newsvine Home
MSN Home
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement

Should teens who "sext" (circulate suggestive photographs electronically) face child pornography charges?

advertisement
Ready To Join?

Newsvine is msnbc.com's social-news community where you can discuss stories, publish your own column, and connect with other news lovers.

Ready To Join?

Results with 33 short comments
Total of 1,561 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

16.7%
Yes. Circulating sexually charged images is a serious offense.
260 votes
77.8%
No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.
1,214 votes
5.6%
I'm not sure. This is a thorny legal issue.
87 votes
Display Comments:
Yes. Circulating sexually charged images is a serious offense.

Just take picture messaging away from the cell phones, then this issue is no longer an issue, why do we need pictures on our
cell phones?

{"commentId":6492210,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"bschulze"}
  • 2 votes
 - 8:38 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
Yes. Circulating sexually charged images is a serious offense.

Child pornography is child pornography. Teens who behave in adult behavior should be treated as adults

{"commentId":6493445,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"rpsaucy"}
  • 3 votes
 - rpsaucy
 - 10:00 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

The parents pay the cell phone bills. Shame on the parents for subscribing to text and photos. $5 a month unlimited, is Unecessary

{"commentId":6494232,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"barbgh"}
  • 1 vote
 - 10:37 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
Yes. Circulating sexually charged images is a serious offense.

10-10-10 this topic? 10 min.-make it not illegal. They are minors, legally treated different. Ten years-change laws and child porn grows

{"commentId":6494664,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"cynthia-preszler"}
  • 3 votes
 - 10:57 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

If the image is of the sender then it shouldn't be a crime. If the receiver sends it on, maybe that should be. Kept between the two - no.

{"commentId":6494957,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"gayle1942"}
  • 1 vote
 - 11:10 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
I'm not sure. This is a thorny legal issue.

from girl to boy or visa vers is one thing but what if one sends it to everyone in school. I think that is when law should crack down.

{"commentId":6495023,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"wt199"}
  • 3 votes
 - 11:13 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
Yes. Circulating sexually charged images is a serious offense.

The law should remain as a deterrant. What's to stop teens from charging classmates to view pics once they are immune from prosecution?

{"commentId":6495587,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"asanchez"}
  • 2 votes
 - 11:39 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

There is potential for adult pedophiles to use these kids for their own gain if they are exempted from the charges - make sure they can't.

{"commentId":6495807,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"lcgfrancis-1"}
  • 1 vote
 - 11:48 am EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

No one understands that these rigid sex laws require preset sentences. Prosecutors/Judges cannot consider the circumstances.

{"commentId":6496399,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"in-10city"}
     - 12:10 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
    I'm not sure. This is a thorny legal issue.

    Teens will do stupid things but I don't think jail is the answer... educating them of the dangers to those use it agaist them.. probabtion

    {"commentId":6496432,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"MKC-TN"}
       - MKC-TN
       - 12:11 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
      No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

      If its between Bf/GF leave it alone.. if the send the picture on then action should be taken against them.. how is it child porn if its you

      {"commentId":6498122,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"GothicMarine"}
         - 1:11 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
        No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

        Silly "Dirty picture " laws must have been dreamed up by the Taliban or Ayatolla Komeini.

        {"commentId":6498382,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"blowphart"}
        • 1 vote
         - 1:20 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
        No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

        How ridiculous! These teens need supervision and parents to act like parents. Cell phones for most teens is not a neccesity.

        {"commentId":6498999,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"jackiemeckel"}
           - 1:42 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
          No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

          Does everyone forget what it is like to be a teenager!? Come on people! Take the kids cell phone. Don't ruin their lives!

          {"commentId":6499660,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"hhscarletgray"}
          • 2 votes
           - 2:04 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
          No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

          Teenagers should not be considered sex offenders for sexting or even for consensual sex. The laws are too harsh and DO NOT WORK!

          {"commentId":6499748,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"toniat"}
             - 2:07 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
            No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

            every generation does it somehow or another. I'm 23 and in HS we used those little "izone" pictures with the sticky backs.

            {"commentId":6499923,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"tarinuphair"}
               - 2:13 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
              I'm not sure. This is a thorny legal issue.

              What happens if some kid then sends off a "sexting" to an adult? like a teacher? does the adult get a pass on the kid's stupid act?

              {"commentId":6501963,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"mhuntley"}
              • 1 vote
               - Hazz
               - 3:29 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
              No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

              absolutly not, I work with offenders though this is serious; I don't think this consequence fits the bill. How about some education on ris

              {"commentId":6502652,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"classyant"}
                 - 3:57 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

                Prosecution of these teens is the state insinuating itself between the teen and his/her own body, certainly a civil rights violation.

                {"commentId":6504191,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"RobinSteele"}
                   - 5:04 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                  No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

                  There is a big difference between a youthful act of indiscretion and an adult who is preying upon juveniles. There should be a distinction

                  {"commentId":6504531,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"td3k"}
                     - td3k
                     - 5:17 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                    No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

                    After taking a class on psychology and adolescent development, this NEEDS to be decriminalized! Look into prefrontal cortex and amygdala

                    {"commentId":6504829,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"elderbrain"}
                    • 1 vote
                     - 5:30 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                    No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

                    It's not a smart idea, but it's certainly not what CP laws were intended to punish.

                    {"commentId":6505259,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"bryanschuman"}
                       - 5:47 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                      I'm not sure. This is a thorny legal issue.

                      Extreme monetary penalizing of the parents should be enacted - parents need to penalize kids just as harshly

                      {"commentId":6505311,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"ousunrfan"}
                         - 5:49 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                        No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

                        Pornography is what it is because it can be labeled as a perversion. Teens being sexually attracted to each other is hardly perverse.

                        {"commentId":6505466,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"rstoute"}
                        • 2 votes
                         - 5:56 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                        No. The child pornography laws were not intended to punish teens who suffer youthful lapses in judgment.

                        I am European; the US is so out of touch with sexual behavior, thanks to religious freaks. Consent can be given as early as at 14,mostly 16

                        {"commentId":6505569,"threadId":"554464","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"salhead"}
                           - salhead
                           - 6:00 pm EDT on Wed Apr 15, 2009
                          advertisement

                          Newsvine Discussion with 111 comments - Click here to jump to the comment form.

                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
                          {"commentId":6493338,"authorDomain":"Will1967"}
                          The proposed legislation in Vermont would decriminalize consensual sexting between kids who are between 13 and 18 years old.

                          Consensual and a person under the age of 18 should not be used in the same sentience!

                          {"commentId":6493338,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"Will1967"}
                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#1 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:53 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":7471956,"authorDomain":"in-10city"}

                          Why - because a person 13 or older is incapable of choosing right from wrong?  A 13 year old cannot determine if it is ok to steal from mother, get drunk, look at dirty pictures, go to church, help out at the soup kitchen, read War and Peace, study hard, run around the block stark naked or kiss someone?  

                          I was taught that by the age of 7, we were morally responsible for our actions.  We were capable of doing right, or committing sins.  If I have free will, I can consent.  It may be stupid and wrong, but don't make me a drooling moron incapable of consent.

                          {"commentId":7471956,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"in-10city"}
                            #1.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 8:46 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":6493686,"authorDomain":"rdsanders"}

                            As any adult can tell you... sending nude pictures of yourself to anyone is not a very bright decision. However, making lifetime criminals out of teens boarders on "stupidity"! Most adults found themselves in similar positions when they were young. Thank God that some people have the common sense to know the difference between a pedophile and a "stupid" decision made by a child.

                            {"commentId":6493686,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"rdsanders"}
                            • 4 votes
                            Reply#2 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:12 AM EDT
                            {"commentId":6526320,"authorDomain":"s-daigle"}

                            I will be the first to say everyone makes mistakes. I know I have. I made a lapse in judegment and sent semi-nude pictures of myself to a boy I was in a relationship with. I know that it was stupid, I comepletely understand that now. And I didnt understand he could easily be charged with child pornography, because he is 21. I was 17 at the time and should have known better, but I made a horrible mistake. I want to be a teacher and dont want that ruined by having charges against me. Im a little for both though, If someone is 13 and sending pictures to someone older that is one thing, dont charge and brand them, if they are older they know what they are doing and should have conceqences.

                            {"commentId":6526320,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"s-daigle"}
                              #2.1 - Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
                              Reply
                              {"commentId":6493720,"authorDomain":"crhea"}

                              This is a current issue at my child's school. Students are having their cell phones taken because one person sent a 'sext' around. Even students that have nothing to do with this are being punished in school because they can't or won't tell on others. These are children that have no reason to know or understand the laws that govern child pornography.

                              {"commentId":6493720,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"crhea"}
                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#3 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:13 AM EDT
                              {"commentId":6493823,"authorDomain":"PINGUINI"}

                              Just because they are under 18 doesn't mean they don't think about sex whether they participate or not. So why should youthful bad judgement be handled the same way as adult sexually deviant behavior? And why should one minor be penalized for being the recipient of unsolicited sexting from another minor?

                              {"commentId":6493823,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"PINGUINI"}
                                Reply#4 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:17 AM EDT
                                {"commentId":6494335,"authorDomain":"barbgh"}

                                The parents are paying the darn cell phone bills, and it is an easy fix. Stop subscribing to the unlimited text and photos....let your teenagers whine about it, and let them get a job and pay for it. We are spoiling the heck out of our kids, and they are abusing all of it! Texting while driving, DANGEROUS! Now sending porn across the phone is making parents cry cuz their daughter let some stupid boyfriend talk her into naked photos. Give the girl some self esteem instead of paying for texting and photos on her phone. $5 a month for unlimited is still $5 a month, or $10 or whatever it costs, I do not even know, with three kids on my plan, none of them can text or send photos, and they hate me for it. A cell phone is a priveledge, and for emergencies, I say.

                                {"commentId":6494335,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"barbgh"}
                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#5 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:42 AM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":6494392,"authorDomain":"cassie5050"}

                                The problem is that parents continue to expect the government to step in and make decisions for them. If this is such a problem, take the cell phone away from the child....Be a parent. Why should the government need to make still another law that will be ignored. This is simply a case where children are given too much freedom and not given the guidance. Obivously, if the child cannot handle the privleged, then it might be smart to eliminate the problem.

                                Many generations have survived without cell phones and maybe the current generation should get a grip.

                                {"commentId":6494392,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"cassie5050"}
                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#6 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:44 AM EDT
                                {"commentId":6494399,"authorDomain":"dmelin"}

                                WOW, that spokesperson for internet safety was indeed THEE Donna Rice of "Gary Hart" fame!!!

                                {"commentId":6494399,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"dmelin"}
                                  Reply#7 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:44 AM EDT
                                  {"commentId":6495604,"authorDomain":"decaldollars"}

                                  She is now a guiding force for good moral choices??? May God help us all!

                                  {"commentId":6495604,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"decaldollars"}
                                    #7.1 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:39 AM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":6494410,"authorDomain":"rantitude"}

                                    Child pornography laws are intended to prevent the sexual exploitation of children by adults. Also, classifying someone as a sexual offender is intended to identify these people as dangers in a society. A child foolishly sending sexual images of themselves to others does not make that child a danger to others in society.

                                    {"commentId":6494410,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"rantitude"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#8 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:45 AM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6495773,"authorDomain":"decaldollars"}

                                    Neither does urinating in public or having sex with your 17 year old girlfriend but boys are registered for both. I say let's be fair across the gender lines and stop treating 15,16,17 year old girls like children. They broke the law, they pay. My 14 year old son received a face book invitation from a friend who had SEVERAL GRAPHIC pictures. She is also 14. My house, mycomputer my name goes on the registry if Johnny comes a knocking. These are not little girls They are not being tricked or lured or groomed or any of the other scary things Johnny tells us to be afraid of. The ones whose pictures are graphic, their parents are the adults in the house and they are distributing pornography. Stop telling our daughters they are blameless victims and perhaps they will stop blaming others and own their actions!

                                    {"commentId":6495773,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"decaldollars"}
                                    • 4 votes
                                    #8.1 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:47 AM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6504136,"authorDomain":"baklayman"}

                                    Agree, If by chance a brother or another person over 18 gets his computer/phone looked at he can be changed with a sex crime. Yet, now they want the "Poor" misguided girl to be excused. Sorry do not agree. Let them walk around with distribution charges then the word will get out fast and stop this. Maybe we will save one 18 yr old from a lifetime list.

                                    {"commentId":6504136,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"baklayman"}
                                      #8.2 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:02 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":6494457,"authorDomain":"ron-fiore"}

                                      think adults think....when we where young all the stupid things we did. now a days they want to charge people for anything. lives can be ruined here and NO they should not be charged. whats next cant wear a bathing suit at the beach?

                                      {"commentId":6494457,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"ron-fiore"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#9 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:47 AM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6494583,"authorDomain":"hbayerl"}

                                      I think that an 18 year old who sends pictures of his ex-girlfriend- knows what he's doing....these kids are more text/internet savvy than we give credit. There shoud be some PUNISHMENT!! Probation, then caught again--- jail time... I'm talking under 18 also! These kids have to learn their behaviors- all of them- have consequences!!!

                                      Parents cen tell, and warn over and over- they have to take some responsibility!!

                                      {"commentId":6494583,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"hbayerl"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#10 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:53 AM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":6494880,"authorDomain":"dmelin"}

                                      Raising a teen is an arduous, tedious job. Allowing your kids to live like little adults, with all of the privileges they want, with no responsibility is like loading a gun and handing it to them. We need to be around every corner, with love and support and with common sense.

                                      {"commentId":6494880,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"dmelin"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#11 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6494984,"authorDomain":"redaly"}

                                      Not every problem needs to be addressed by the criminal justice system.

                                      {"commentId":6494984,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"redaly"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#12 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6495085,"authorDomain":"flmutley"}

                                      Good lord, kids have been doing this for as long as a camera has been around. You can't stop kids from being kids...take that away or punish them and next they will be showing in the flesh instead of the camera...but then again kids have been doing that also for ages...sometimes I think the laws have gone a little to far...just as the case with the boy farting on a school bus..and being punished...what is wrong with america? I say...let the parents deal with issues such as this.

                                      {"commentId":6495085,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"flmutley"}
                                      • 2 votes
                                      Reply#13 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:16 AM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6497746,"authorDomain":"blahhhh"}

                                      I agree 100% with you, Bruce!

                                      {"commentId":6497746,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"blahhhh"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      #13.1 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:58 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":6495157,"authorDomain":"fieldsl"}

                                      This is an issue that I saw coming a mile away when they first started putting cameras in cell phones. Yes, these are kids making stupid mistakes but at the same time this IS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, like it or not, that's what it boils down to. To change laws so that there is "consensual sexting" allowed will only lead to worse problems. That is like saying that as long as crack dealers only sell to "consensual" junkies, it's OK. How absurd would that be?! The laws either need to be changed to reflect the new technology and problems that come with it, ie. if the people involved are minors then they should face counseling and mandatory surrender of the cell phones, OR the manufacturers of the phones need to step up to the plate and acknowledge what a societal nightmare their greed has unleashed and stop making phones with cameras, by force if necessary. This MUST STOP! Our society has become DRENCHED in sexuality and it is doing DAMAGE to our kids. PARENTS: STOP letting your kids run the show...NO more "sexting", NO more racy TV shows, NO more violent video games, NO more sexually explicit movies, NO more sleazy Cosmo magazines for your TEEN daughters. When are you people going to get how much damage is being done? START BEING PARENTS. UNBELIEVABLE!

                                      {"commentId":6495157,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"fieldsl"}
                                        Reply#14 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:19 AM EDT
                                        {"commentId":6496367,"authorDomain":"meisousei713"}

                                        I think people are getting away from the reason why child pornography was banned. People use the justification that it was banned because it's "bad", and don't get any further than that. You need to define why it's bad. CP is bad because it damages the children that are involved. They are often raped, assaulted, threatened, and mentally/physically damaged. That is why CP is illegal. But in this frenzy to define abuse and protect our children, we have gone overboard and are now ruining kid's lives just because we think we're protecting them.

                                        Now take a look at sexting. Are the teenagers willingly taking pictures of themselves being raped? Assaulted? Threatened? No. There is a difference between child exploitation done by others for a mental disease and then pictures taken of teenagers by themselves to be used with a significant other for normal sexual desire. A 15 year old having sex with another 15 year old is not statuatory rape--why are pictures being treated with much more severity?

                                        I know the idea of a teenager trying to be a adult is scary for a lot of parents. Many parents don't want to think of their little princesses becoming sexually active, because it represents the loss of the innocence that makes us love children so dearly. But you have to recognize that we teenagers do stupid stuff. It's apart of growing up. You can tell that kid over and over and over that touching the stove hurts, but eventualyl they're going to challenge what you say and touch it, and learn for themselves. If you keep on coddling us and telling us that you'll protect us from whatever influence you deem "bad", you won't prepare them for the real world, and you'll hurt them instead of helping them. You gotta let go.

                                        {"commentId":6496367,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"meisousei713"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        #14.1 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":6496410,"authorDomain":"raishiin"}

                                        If the participants are close to each others age I seriously disagree with your perspective on calling it child pornography. What is child pornography anyway? Children at an age in which they are not capable of having sex and don't even desire the interaction. Add in a variable of when their really capable of making respectable decisions in regards to sex to fine tune the graph there. (Age of consent in most states varies because of differing points of view here.)

                                        Sure, I believe in certain laws preventing far older men or women having sex with people who are young enough that their going to have bad judgement but old enough to have sexual interests... But there are exceptions and Vermont seems to get that, you can't ruin a young man or woman's life because their naturally curious and a bit sexually deviant when its both consensual and participants are within a few years of age can you?

                                        To be honest, I think people tend to LOVE misconstruing sex as an overall negative. In American society where most people are religious and tend to follow some form of Christianity sex just doesn't have a place. Its problematic for young children who just start to have these natural feelings when you to have to quash them or ruin their lives because they make what you call a stupid decision based on differing moral values. If there weren't STD's or other other things to worry about I'm pretty sure you'd be in a precarious position to tell your kids not to have sex when today all they need is a slap on the wrist and advice to make sure they use a condom to avoid most of them!

                                        Anyway, I feel fairly strongly on the matter and believe its up to the individual more-so than the biased population. If their "underage" but still within a few years of age and its not like someone far too old for them is involved and it also remains between the two of them its NOT something that requires legal intervention. Its not as though a 16 year old girl snaps an erotic picture of herself to send to a guy she likes who's 18 and he goes and spreads it around to people. Thats when theres a problem, when other people get involved or the age difference is too great or its non-consensual.

                                        If you blindly stifle people for this kind of behavior their going to be repressed, depressed, and like me, probably want to move to a more tolerant country. Chances are they might damn well become suicidal if you truly ruin their lives over it.

                                        {"commentId":6496410,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"raishiin"}
                                        • 2 votes
                                        #14.2 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:10 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":6498529,"authorDomain":"GothicMarine"}

                                        Seriously.. Would you rather have your kid have sex or send an Explicit picture over his/her phone..... Dont Blame it on TV or Computers or Video Games or Anything like that.. you have control over all those(unless your to stupid to know how to do it).. No wonder all of our good games are being Messed up.. the Rating on a game is for Muturity Level Not Your IQ.. if the games says rated T for teen dont buy the damn thing for your 10 year old.. duh.. and who cares if i send a naked picture of myself to my GirlFreind.. Im over 16 and the consent age is 16 There for im over the consent age so calll it what ever you want.. im still over the age so its not child porn.. Just because the phone company put the camera in there doesnt mean you have to give your kid picture messaging.. mabye we should be smarter and i think the stupid parent who gave the kid the phone in the first place should be smacked upside the head.. anyone under 17 doesnt need a freaking cell phone.. And if your dumb and give your kid a phone block the damn MMS (picture messaging) so they cant send or receive any.. so if your kid sends the pictures it should be the parents fault for allowing the kid to have MMS because you have to be 18 to have your own cell phone contract

                                        {"commentId":6498529,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"GothicMarine"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        #14.3 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:25 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":6495318,"authorDomain":"jbrown-neva"}

                                        I feel that sexting is not a reasonable way to require someone register as a sex offender. They should not have to register as a sex offender because it isnt really a sexual offense. It needs to be handled differently.

                                        {"commentId":6495318,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"jbrown-neva"}
                                          Reply#15 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:28 AM EDT
                                          {"commentId":8299410,"authorDomain":"halfgingertweak"}

                                          What they really need is a special misdemeanor charge for anyone under the age of 18 sending such photos without malicious motives. If they are sending photos of themselves to someone who doesn't mind seeing it, and they get caught, it ought to be classed as a misdemeanor. If they are pissed at an ex and send naked photos of their ex to everyone they know, they should be punished under child pornography laws.

                                          {"commentId":8299410,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"halfgingertweak"}
                                            #15.1 - Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:18 AM EDT
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":6495339,"authorDomain":"dneuwirth-neva"}

                                            I think that the teens who send them should not get in trouble at all. If they want there pictures out there they should be able to send it to there boy friend or who ever they want. they should not get charged for doing this i do not think it is wrong.

                                            {"commentId":6495339,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"dneuwirth-neva"}
                                              Reply#16 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:28 AM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6495479,"authorDomain":"jbrown-neva"}

                                              I feel that sexting should not require a person to register as a sex offender. Sexting is dealing with mainly teens, if a teacher were to recieve the photos however that is a completly different story. If the image is of the sender it should not be a crime at all because it is their choice of putting the image out. I mean if they dont want images of their body going all over the world they should not let the image be taken or take the image themselves and send them out.

                                              {"commentId":6495479,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"jbrown-neva"}
                                                Reply#17 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:34 AM EDT
                                                {"commentId":6495877,"authorDomain":"decaldollars"}

                                                I hate my teacher. I send a nasty picture. Teacher fired but I am a blameless child??? Young women or the parents who provide the tools for such criminal acts must be held responsible or we should re-write the laws. As is stands it is just not fair that kids who have the money for a good attorney get away with anything and those who don't get an orange jump suit and a life long rope around their neck. The just-us system is out of control

                                                {"commentId":6495877,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"decaldollars"}
                                                  #17.1 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:52 AM EDT
                                                  {"commentId":6496702,"authorDomain":"wendy-notarnicola"}

                                                  It's not just girls sending nude photos, by the way.

                                                  {"commentId":6496702,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"wendy-notarnicola"}
                                                    #17.2 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:22 PM EDT
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":6495515,"authorDomain":"mmclarke22"}

                                                    I have a 13 yearold and 10 year old and I had heard about sexting 6 months or so ago. I have not had any problems with either of my sons sending picture texts but I still called my cellphone company to see my options. I want parents to know you can block your childs phone from recieving or sending picture texts . This is called MMS texting. They can still recieve SMS texts which are the normal texting but those dont have the ability to attach music or pictures. My Carrier is ATT and there is no charge to do this. You do have to call them . It is not a feature you can change on their website but it was very easy for them to do. I just gave my 10 year old a cell phone and had them remove the MMS texting at set up. I am finding that many times most of the children are getting these texts from other people that they dont even know. Someone else has forwarded there number on etc. This protects them even if they had no intention of sexting.

                                                    {"commentId":6495515,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"mmclarke22"}
                                                      Reply#18 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
                                                      Reply
                                                      {"commentId":6495523,"authorDomain":"astaley-neva"}

                                                      I dont think that they should be tried as a pedifile . But i do think that they do need to get some kind of charge just not being charged as a pedifile . Because i think that is a little exsessave , They need to be charged as a juvinial not an adult . if it is a photo of yourself and you are just sending it to lets say your boyfriend than i think it is ok. If you get one from your girlfriend than it is ok cuz it is ok cuz it is for your eyes only and noone else will see it.but as long as your boyfriend/ girlfriend does not send it to any one else .

                                                      {"commentId":6495523,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"astaley-neva"}
                                                        Reply#19 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6495597,"authorDomain":"kouderkirk-neva"}

                                                        I think the child pornography laws were made before texting and that some one shouldn't be punished on laws made twenty some years ago before there was even a possibility of this. Also most kids in America probably don't even know this is a crime. I don't believe that some one should be charged for when most people have no idea there is a law on this. I also believe if it is a picture to your boyfriend then he will see you anyways or probably already has so a parent shouldn't freak out Cause no matter what its going to happens. Yes it is wrong when your picture gets lost but you are the one that sent it so its sad. If you take a picture you have given consent for it to be seen by any one who looks.

                                                        {"commentId":6495597,"threadId":"554472","contentId":"2686422","authorDomain":"kouderkirk-neva"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        Reply#20 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:39 AM EDT
                                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
                                                        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"554472","isPrivate":false}
                                                        Leave a Comment:
                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.