MSNBC Home
Newsvine Home
MSN Home
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement

Should CIA agents be tried for torture?

In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, CIA operatives were allowed to shackle, strip and waterboard terror suspects. Now, President Barack Obama has assured these operatives that they will not be prosecuted for their rough interrogation tactics.

advertisement
Ready To Join?

Newsvine is msnbc.com's social-news community where you can discuss stories, publish your own column, and connect with other news lovers.

Ready To Join?

Results with 124 short comments
Total of 7,858 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

67.1%
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.
5,275 votes
29.4%
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.
2,313 votes
3.4%
Maybe. I can’t agree with the methods, but these are dangerous times and the interrogations did provide details about other planned terrorist plots.
270 votes
Display Comments:
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

We broke International Law, those who went along with the Bush thugs must be punished

{"commentId":6542548,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"cmilhaus"}
  • 14 votes
 - 12:50 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

We broke International Law, those who went along with the Bush thugs must be punished

{"commentId":6542557,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"cmilhaus"}
  • 12 votes
 - 12:51 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

They should have known better. Even if legal advice said OK, it had never been condoned before - so they knew it was unethical.

{"commentId":6542954,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"droessler"}
  • 11 votes
 - Dorfy
 - 1:06 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

I know Obama is fair and ethical and wants to pick his battles, but this must be addressed so it never happens again!

{"commentId":6543531,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"trish-1"}
  • 14 votes
 - 1:28 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

But lets worry about our economy and the other wars first, the trials can always happen later, and this time include Bush and Cheney!

{"commentId":6543643,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"cynthia-evans-1"}
  • 5 votes
 - 1:33 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

They did there job,which was told to them to do from the top.Your boss tells you to do it,you do it.

{"commentId":6544157,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"giants1959"}
  • 7 votes
 - 1:52 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, and Wolfowitz should be tried instead for war crimes.

{"commentId":6544660,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mattfromtexas"}
  • 10 votes
 - 2:12 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

Those who sanctioned the torture should be waterboarded, locked in boxes filled with bugs, and get @!$%# slapped - It's poetic justice..

{"commentId":6545039,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"kclyn2004"}
  • 6 votes
 - 2:27 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

Those who made the Policy and endorsed it should be tried and shot.

{"commentId":6546521,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"keithnvalorie"}
  • 6 votes
 - 3:30 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

The law is the law. If it doesn't apply to all, it doesn't apply to anyone.

{"commentId":6546898,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"kford"}
  • 14 votes
 - 3:47 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

I'm sure Obama is weighing overall affect of prosecution and the pain it would cause. Keep looking forward!

{"commentId":6547418,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"lmarct"}
  • 5 votes
 - LMarcT
 - 4:08 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

No one is above the law. After WWII were'nt many japanese hung for war crimes? Not just the commanding officers, but those who did the act

{"commentId":6548401,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"candicedelvillar"}
  • 13 votes
 - CdV
 - 4:55 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

The humanity will destroy itself if we keep justifying war crimes when they occure on our behalf.

{"commentId":6551634,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mea"}
  • 11 votes
 - 8:27 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

Yes. The CIA officials may have believed they were just doing their job. But Nuremberg principles don't allow a "following orders" defens

{"commentId":6551818,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"rosemary-blanchard"}
  • 14 votes
 - 8:39 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

CIA officers should not be prosecuted any more than the Abu Grahib soldiers for following orders. Those who issued the orders/opinions shou

{"commentId":6552155,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"danjoyner"}
  • 4 votes
 - 9:04 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

Either you are a law abiding and honorable Patriot to this country or you are a war criminal just like Saddam was!

{"commentId":6553465,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mikela"}
  • 14 votes
 - mikela
 - 10:48 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

The next asinine media type or politician, who brings this up, should be tortured, Vietnam style, not what thes jerks are calling torture

{"commentId":6553646,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jerry-hudges"}
  • 8 votes
 - 11:04 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

Yes,investigate.Low level operatives could be helpful.Plea deals could be reached for their cooperation.Why hamstring an investigation?

{"commentId":6553967,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"don-carey"}
  • 6 votes
 - 11:32 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

The higher ups, who gave the authorization should be investigated.

{"commentId":6553982,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jamesvanspach"}
  • 3 votes
 - 11:34 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
No. They are dedicated men and women who were just doing what the Justice Department had sanctioned in advance.

However, the Justice Department officials who sanctioned those methods MUST be tried.

{"commentId":6554048,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"f-yulyahshieva"}
     - Fsummit
     - 11:39 pm EDT on Fri Apr 17, 2009
    Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

    If these people are let go without even a rebuke, we spitin the face of the Charter of Human Rigts - we make Nurmberg a Victors' Revenge

    {"commentId":6555478,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jboost45"}
       - 2:19 am EDT on Sat Apr 18, 2009
      Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

      Yes, not only the perpetrators, but also the people that wrote and approved this tactics

      {"commentId":6555777,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"dr--c"}
         - 3:23 am EDT on Sat Apr 18, 2009
        Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

        Torture is torture and no amount of prevacication will change that. As I read the torture memos and IRC report I am ashamed for our countr

        {"commentId":6555891,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"wchere"}
           - 3:55 am EDT on Sat Apr 18, 2009
          Yes. Their actions were clearly harsh and abusive. The U.S. would never tolerate it against its own citizens.

          It's torture and there isn't any sugar coated word to make it sound nice.

          {"commentId":6555936,"threadId":"556527","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mikohanyou88"}
          • 9 votes
           - Yesse
           - 4:14 am EDT on Sat Apr 18, 2009
          advertisement

          Newsvine Discussion with 423 comments - Click here to jump to the comment form.

          Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 13
          {"commentId":6542602,"authorDomain":"cmilhaus"}

          Our Government at the time went out of its way to justify the breaking of International Law, and those who blindly followed those Bush "goons" leading us at the time, deserve to be punished under International Law. It's like the old saying "you do the crime, you do the time"

          {"commentId":6542602,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"cmilhaus"}
          • 12 votes
          Reply#1 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:53 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6558503,"authorDomain":"doloresgrissom"}

          Maybe we should BEHEAD the Bush "goons" like the terrorists do us!!!!!!!!!!

          Get a grip........these terrorists are monsters. Fine for you to say while you're safe in the USA. Or are you, now that Obama is in charge?

          {"commentId":6558503,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"doloresgrissom"}
          • 10 votes
          #1.1 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:56 AM EDT
          {"commentId":6562571,"authorDomain":"josephhfietiv"}

          During the Nurenburg War Crimes Tribunals the most repeated phrase by the Nazi's was " I was only doing my job". If our intelligence agencies had not been so involved in their silly turf wars and listened to the reports of suspicious individuals going to flight school the 9/11 catastrophe would have never happened. Remember the female FBI agent who was demoted because she kept trying to tell her superiors that these arabs posed a threat.Instead of listening to her they sent her off to a crap assignment to bury her. Had our intelligence agencies properly protected our borders 9/11 would have never happened but since the business community is so intent on getting cheap labor into the country the floodgates have been opened and it isn't a matter of if,just when more terrorist fly in under the radar. Don't pat yourselfs on the back just yet because we haven't been hit again. There were 9 years between the first and second attack on the World Trade Center.Also don't think that Al Quida is our only enemy. We need to be much more restrictive on who gets in to our country or all the torture in the world won't be able to protect us.

          {"commentId":6562571,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"josephhfietiv"}
          • 6 votes
          #1.2 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:17 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6590326,"authorDomain":"mwtate29"}

          Screw you! You liberal pantywaist! Al Queda killed approx. 4,000 U.S. citizens. If the CIA got the info they needed by pouring water on those jackasses, then so be it! They desreved worse!

          {"commentId":6590326,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mwtate29"}
          • 11 votes
          #1.3 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:42 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6593302,"authorDomain":"ro-jo7449"}

          mikey29 - where did you get that number? Under 3,000 and not all were US citizens. That doesn't minimize the tragedy...it merely points out you really don't know what you are talking about. Credibility counts. You don't think us killing tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis (please stop and tell us you understand that Iraq was neither part of, nor a breeding ground for Al Queda) puts us in a bad light? I am so sick of hate begets hate...nothing good comes from it.

          From the top down, everyone involved in the torture needs to be held responsible. Lindy England clearly was not acting alone, but how many years did they make her do?

          {"commentId":6593302,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"ro-jo7449"}
          • 1 vote
          #1.4 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:51 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6593524,"authorDomain":"justplainloser99"}

          "Get a grip........these terrorists are monsters. Fine for you to say while you're safe in the USA. Or are you, now that Obama is in charge?"

          How does tortuting people make us any better?

          {"commentId":6593524,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"justplainloser99"}
          • 3 votes
          #1.5 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:03 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6594521,"authorDomain":"DeMock"}

          Deeg wrote:

          these terrorists are monsters

          Are you really so scared that you are willing to forget our laws and morals? Is the Boogie man so frightning? Do you really think these people are so powerful that we should toss our good name in the mud?

          {"commentId":6594521,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"DeMock"}
          • 3 votes
          #1.6 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:04 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6595312,"authorDomain":"sue-3"}

          How about all those "good Germans" and Japanese who were "just following orders? Sometimes a person has to say, "Enough! I won't do a wrong thing even if they tell me it's legal". It's called morality and conscience.

          {"commentId":6595312,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"sue-3"}
          • 1 vote
          #1.7 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:54 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6626821,"authorDomain":"smilingrose"}
          Can't keep me downDeleted
          {"commentId":6628532,"authorDomain":"Bmans62"}

          How many lives of our fellow Americans were saved because of these methods to obtain information.  I am sick to death of these one sided reporting of the news media.  Release the results of this so called torture.

          How many of you would like your family killed as a result of being kind to these terrorist?  I suppose if they blew up Boston, we would give them milk and cookies.  War is hell and the consequences of peoples actions justifies whatever it takes to make us safe.

          {"commentId":6628532,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"Bmans62"}
          • 3 votes
          #1.9 - Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:46 AM EDT
          {"commentId":6629817,"authorDomain":"gparents2000"}

          It is quite simple. Go ahead and let these "good" detainees go and pay them big bucks for their discomfort. I want to be like Obama not Bush. Now the next time an American citizen or any innocent person gets killed no one say one word about justice. No one say word about how bad an attack on a mass of people is so disheartening. No one say one word about how Americans ban together in a time of crisis. All the crying and anger after 9/11 must have been fake. This was not cruel torture by any means. In fact it was a bit light compared to what our POW's went through. So yes apologize for it. Say you are sorry. Prosecute all involved. But be sure it is what you want. Because when another tragety hits I for one do not want to hear the out pouring of sorrow. You are opening the door now for political gains. Not because it was wrong. Now is the time to act. You can't close the barn door after the cows have left. It is a shame we have to hide like cowards and not be proud of our country. We use to think we were a great and powerful nation. We use to have pride in our country. Anymore we are just like the rest of the world and no different. That is a shame.

          {"commentId":6629817,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"gparents2000"}
          • 1 vote
          #1.10 - Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:43 AM EDT
          {"commentId":6644965,"authorDomain":"fesler"}

          Just a ploy to take our minds off what is going on. We are loosing all our freedoms in the name of peace when we are the only ones trying to keep peace.

          Just as Obama bowed to the Saudi King, our country is being surrendered to the Middle East without even a whimper from most of the people in the USA. They just sit and yell "Give Me" with their hand out.

          Look what the other side does to people who do not work in their countries. Gays are beheaded, women are killed just for looking at a man or dressing the wrong way.

          Get the drugs and booze out of your system and pay attention...or all will be lost including your life.

          {"commentId":6644965,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"fesler"}
          • 1 vote
          #1.11 - Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:38 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6758840,"authorDomain":"jtownsley"}

          So what your saying is, since you elected the officials you should also be prosecuted. We have elected officials, we elected them. Who really is to blame?

          {"commentId":6758840,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jtownsley"}
            #1.12 - Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:49 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":6543083,"authorDomain":"Drackcove"}

            Prosecuted, no. Fired maybe (they should have done something to stop it.). The people who should be prosecuted are Bush's cronies who were in the justice department!

            {"commentId":6543083,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"Drackcove"}
            • 4 votes
            Reply#2 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:11 PM EDT
            {"commentId":6642190,"authorDomain":"degray1"}

            I don't believe that. Alls fair, so they say, and I agree. Listen, all I know is Obama is making friends with a bunch of scumbags. He already has questionable friends. He has everyone, so turned around. He does something good on one hand but no one knows what the other hand is doing. I think there is much more to this than anyone wants to admit. The left keeps saying move forward. But all I hear is the blame game, come on people., really move forward and open your eyes and ears. Our Country will be stripped of all freedoms if we keep allowing this behavior. It would be sad if we all wake up after the fact. The government and the left -wing media will run us all.

            {"commentId":6642190,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"degray1"}
              #2.1 - Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:54 PM EDT
              {"commentId":6724996,"authorDomain":"DeMock"}

              Josh Drew wrote -

              they should have done something to stop it.

              done something to stop it? They told them to do it... I do think you are correct that at the VERY least these people should be fired.

              {"commentId":6724996,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"DeMock"}
              • 1 vote
              #2.2 - Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:04 AM EDT
              Reply
              {"commentId":6543194,"authorDomain":"droessler"}

              As career professionals in the CIA - they knew the arguments pro and con. They knew about the Geneva Conventions and treaties that expressly ban torture. They knew about our history of condemning and in the case of WWII - putting to death - those who torture.

              These are not novices. They are just career folks who will do anything they are told. It's like giving the Marquis d'Sade a whip and saying it's OK to go ahead. They want to do this, so it doesn't take much to convince them.

              We have to quit catering to the CIA. They have proven repeatedly that they are unethical, and disruptive to international norms. They ultimately cause people around the world to distrust us and smirk at our hypocrisy.

              Bush said he wanted to free the world from oppression. Whose oppression? We say we stand for "the good", but act every bit as evil as "the bad".

              I am grateful that Obama brought this out for all to see. It is disgusting and an ugly reminder of how cynnical and power-hungry Bush/Cheney was. But we needed to see it in the light of day - This is the transparency Obama promised. I do wish though that he would at least support a Congressional investigation with civil if not criminal consequences.

              They should be fired for sure. We have to quit protecting employees who are senior just because they are senior. They need to be hired or fired based on their performance and judgement.

              {"commentId":6543194,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"droessler"}
              • 10 votes
              Reply#3 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:15 PM EDT
              {"commentId":6554673,"authorDomain":"regularguyindy"}

              I'm sorry, but I believe you should maybe put yourself in the position Bush and the administration were facing.  We had just had over 3,000 Americans killed, and statements that this was just the beginning.  In a perfect world, we could sit these people down, and ask them politely, to please give us all the information you have about future plans to destroy America and kill Americans.  Do you honestly believe that you would acquire any information.?  These are people who total goal in life is to destroy anything about America and it's citizens.

              I'm not saying that I'm proud of the CIA, or anything about forced information.  But your living in a dream land if you don't think the same thing  never went on in WWII, or any other major conflict the USA has endured. 

              I would really like to know how you would have handled the situation.  I just know that for 8 years we have not had a terrorist attack, and not because they haven't been planned.  Mostly because we have obtained information about them.  Let's just hope for the next four years we will have control over the situation. 

              {"commentId":6554673,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"regularguyindy"}
              • 5 votes
              #3.1 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:39 AM EDT
              {"commentId":6556492,"authorDomain":"bell6040"}

              Granted 9/11 had taken place, but what gives us the right to be judge, jury and executioner. Americans act like they are better than the rest of the people in the world, but I beg to differ we are just as hypocritical. We will do whatever pleases us as long as we can find a way to justify it whether it's right or wrong.

              Two wrongs does not make a right 9/11 was wrong, and what we did was just as wrong too, but some people are willing to believe anything, but I learned a long time ago to take everything with a grain of salt.

              The Bush admiistration has told so many lies that one doesn't know what to believe anymore, but my parents taught me if you tell one lie then you have to tell another lie to cover up the first lie, and then another, etc. I think Bush and and his cronies should be tried for war crimes just like we did Saddam.

              {"commentId":6556492,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"bell6040"}
              • 7 votes
              #3.2 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:19 AM EDT
              {"commentId":6569243,"authorDomain":"lisamo"}

              I agree with you

              {"commentId":6569243,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"lisamo"}
                #3.3 - Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:57 AM EDT
                {"commentId":6573382,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

                Is it any wonder that the financial crisis followed the unjustified war and torture scandals. If the law doesn't apply anywhere else why think it would apply to book cooking and financial scams? Until the law of the land applies to everyone we are screwed.

                {"commentId":6573382,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                • 5 votes
                #3.4 - Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:28 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6588832,"authorDomain":"johnanddiane"}

                You are right on, there must not be a double standard. All should be Tried for their crimes, starting with Bush and all his henchmen. From top to bottom. This includes the treasonous financial terrorism that has happened under them as well

                {"commentId":6588832,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"johnanddiane"}
                • 5 votes
                #3.5 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:40 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6589797,"authorDomain":"nsandine"}

                I voted for Obama and I am discusted with his decision to release these memos. They are top secret for a reason. For those of you that tout the Geneva Conventions...The Geneva Conventions state the prisoner must be wearing a uniform. These terrorists don't wear uniforms. Several have stated that our methods of interrogation increase violence and terror recruits, can any of you substantiate that claim?

                {"commentId":6589797,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"nsandine"}
                  #3.6 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:19 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":6589967,"authorDomain":"dvdkorn187"}

                  Why must all anti-war people blame everything on the Bush Administration? You know, if Clinton would have done his job in the first place, maybe we wouldn't be where we are today - but that is a different topic.

                  In a perfect little world, yes torture should be banned and criminalized but I hate to break it to you, the world isn't perfect! We need to have the ability to defend ourselves and it is the government's responsibility to give us that kind of protection - by any means possible. Unfortunately it will sometimes require obscene tactics to get information out of these terrorists when they do not cooperate, especially if we caught wind of an imminent attack - but it should be used at a last resort. They need to have waterboarding and other tactics in their bag of tricks in case they ever need it. Torture is horrible to think about, but sometimes it is necessary.

                  It makes me wonder how the Bush "henchmen" were able to thwart off so many attacks the last 7 years.

                  {"commentId":6589967,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"dvdkorn187"}
                  • 4 votes
                  #3.7 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:26 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":6594155,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                  It makes me wonder how the Bush "henchmen" were able to thwart off so many attacks the last 7 years.

                  Thrawt what attacks? The pet goat attacks as outlined in his favorite book?

                  {"commentId":6594155,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #3.8 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:40 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":6594259,"authorDomain":"dvdkorn187"}

                  OH MAN WOW!!! That was a good one! I about fell out of my chair! You should do your own stand-up Stone!!!

                  {"commentId":6594259,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"dvdkorn187"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #3.9 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:47 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":6596489,"authorDomain":"fenderbluesjr"}

                  Wow, Dorfy, Let's see you mentioned the Geneva Convention, which only pertains to prisoners of war. Then Marquis D'sade as if torture in this case would gratify the CIA. Then it was George W. who was freeing us all from oppression, by being an oppressor himself. Well, Al Queda is not at war with us and the Geneva terms don't apply! Just like Gitmo, those a--holes want a speedy and fair trial, they're acting as though they are citizens or common criminals. These people are terrorists, enemies of our country, the bad guy, remember that World Trade Center thing, etc. Al Queda has not declared war on us, although they are a threat to not only America but to anyone who is not a Muslim. Couldn't be any more racist, could it? They ( Al Queda ) are to busy denying human rights, blowing up non-radical Islamic or public schools, prohibiting young women from being educated, systematically taking the young males to be recruited as suicide bombers in Jihad run camps. Since they are no longer students, Al Queda is brainwashing them into " leathal Stuntmen ", all of this, hiding behind the name of Allah. No, Al Queda becomes this infectous parasite on a nation, check out whats going on now in Pakistan. Let me ask you Dorfy, and I don't want a," that don't make it right response to the question" answer. Since you clearly know what has been done wrong, what would you do with these killers that are caught?

                  {"commentId":6596489,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"fenderbluesjr"}
                  • 2 votes
                  #3.10 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:17 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":6631726,"authorDomain":"csaw6988"}

                  John Lynch,

                  Let's get open up the courts then and try:

                  President Eisenhower for the Bay of Pigs incident (he authorized it after all)

                  President Eisenhower for Gary Power's overflight of the Soviet Union.

                  President Kennedy for overflying Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis, getting at least one Air Force pilot killed.

                  President Johnson for starting the Vietnam War (Gulf of Tonkin incident)

                  President Nixon for whatever you choose.

                  President Ford for the Mayaguez recapture.

                  President Carter for the botched hostage rescue when he refused to go forward.

                  President Regan for Grenada.

                  President Bush for not supporting the Kuwati in time to prevent Saddam from invading.

                  and President Clinton for not getting bin Laden when he was offered him up on a gold platter.

                  {"commentId":6631726,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"csaw6988"}
                    #3.11 - Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:08 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":6631752,"authorDomain":"csaw6988"}

                    John Lynch,

                    Let's get open up the courts then and try:

                    President Eisenhower for the Bay of Pigs incident (he authorized it after all)

                    President Eisenhower for Gary Power's overflight of the Soviet Union.

                    President Kennedy for overflying Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis, getting at least one Air Force pilot killed.

                    President Johnson for starting the Vietnam War (Gulf of Tonkin incident)

                    President Nixon for whatever you choose.

                    President Ford for the Mayaguez recapture.

                    President Carter for the botched hostage rescue when he refused to go forward.

                    President Regan for Grenada.

                    President Bush for not supporting the Kuwati in time to prevent Saddam from invading.

                    and President Clinton for not getting bin Laden when he was offered him up on a gold platter.

                    {"commentId":6631752,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"csaw6988"}
                      #3.12 - Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":6543347,"authorDomain":"roydenchick"}

                      The "I was just following orders" or "I was told it was OK to do it" arguements didn't hold up in the post WWII war crimes courts did they...

                      Indeed, when the US was helping setup the West German military after the war, they ensured that West German military personel were explicitly told that they MUST (it was their duty) disobey an order they deemed violated international law and/or internation agreements on human rights.

                      Now the US government (again) holds it's own to a different standard? I'm sorry. These people knew what they were doing, and their understanding of what America stands for was either distorted, forgotten of deliberately placed to one side as they hid behnid these "legal opinions". Their actions are un-American in this observers opinion, and they do NOT deserve the leniency they are receiving from the Obama administraton.

                      Does any rational American not squirm at how we are viewed internationally when we come out with self serving actions like these? How can we lead when we set examples like this? The truth is, we can't. Folks may like Obama, and our wealth, but if they disappear we go back to being the bully on the international stage. Sad, but true. Personally, I'd rather be loved and trusted by our allies, and respected by our enemies, than feared and distrusted by everyone...

                      {"commentId":6543347,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"roydenchick"}
                        Reply#4 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:21 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":6543629,"authorDomain":"DEBE"}

                        Hi everyone;

                        Here's what I think - President Bush and Vice President Cheney orders were to torture. Now in any other circumstance the military can question the validity of these types of orders and they can refuse to carry them out if they want to be court-martialed and jailed for treason. If the orders had come from someone other than the president I would say put them all on trial. But because the orders to torture came from the highest office - the people doing the ordering should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

                        No one is above the law - but when that law says you can do these things - then is it a crime committed by the people who carry out the orders or is it that the people doing the ordering  are the criminals?  I think we should investigate everything that went down with our ex-president and vice president. We now know they were engaging in illegal activities and should be prosecuted. Our history shows that we as Americans have short memories when it comes to crimes committed by our own individual parties - Clinton was a dog but everyone still loves him. Nixon was a total criminal - what happened to him - nothing. But this time - I don't think we should forget. What Bush and Cheney have done to our country in more ways then one should never be forgotten. Our economy in shambles - our reputation around the world is that of thugs and war mongerers. I am very proud of our new president and I hope he doesn't get caught up in the politics of this - I really think our country needs to see exactly what was done to us.

                        {"commentId":6543629,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"DEBE"}
                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#5 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:32 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":6554540,"authorDomain":"frechek1"}

                        Hey, this release of this information is ALL about politics. It is being used as a diversion from his socialist goals and current international failure. As to the economy, the Dems had control of Congress for two years. Franks and Dodd should be put in prison for their role in the current crisis or at least for sheer stupidity. And as to torture, what the Vietnamese did to the POWs was torture not this fluff-stuff. Most folks think a day without their iPod and cell phone is torture. The world is laughing at us now. Satisfied? By the way, Clinton is STILL an a$$h*le. Nixon did wrong, but he was at least respected in the international community, even feared. Even the French president calls Obama naive.

                        {"commentId":6554540,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"frechek1"}
                        • 5 votes
                        #5.1 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:25 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":6556515,"authorDomain":"bell6040"}

                        The neo conservative keeps saying that Obama is a socialist, maybe you should go back and read your history book to really know what a socialist is, and stop believing the Shawn Hannity, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bernie Goldberg, and all of the rest of the folks flaunting that "socialist" attitude around. If you look at the tea bagger party it appeared to be more about bigorty and hate mongering than anything else.

                        The American people are tired of the hostile rheotric that's going no where, but tearing the country apart. Remember, read your history books ya'll hear.

                        {"commentId":6556515,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"bell6040"}
                        • 3 votes
                        #5.2 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:26 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":6564767,"authorDomain":"yorichy"}

                        Why should we blame Bush for the economy? We should blame ourselves for abusing credit, for just sitting back and let our country get itself in the mess that we are in. Or the companies that hired illegal aliens for the sake of the almighty dollar or how about us for voting in the politicians on both sides of the isle who allowed all this to happen during the early stages way before Bush.

                        We need to be accountable as a nation, not use a man as a scapegoat who had allot of crap to deal during his presidency. I like to see those who are quick to point there fingers deal with what he dealt with before they pass judgment.

                        Let’s look at ourselves as a whole.

                        {"commentId":6564767,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"yorichy"}
                          #5.3 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:59 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6582367,"authorDomain":"karvin-s"}

                          Hey, stat, have you noticed (you haven't, becuase you weren't told to) that the same people that went after Clinton for Whitewater (many years in the past) are many of the ones now calling on us to forget the past and look to the future? We should put as much dilligence in investigating the Shrub as we did in investigating Clinton. When it's over, if they ordered or okayed torture, they should be in Ft Leavenworth, KS, making small stones out of large ones. Look at the bright side, we'll save lots of money on the no longer necessary Secret Service detachment. The prison guards will be his security detachment.

                          {"commentId":6582367,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"karvin-s"}
                          • 3 votes
                          #5.4 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":6597134,"authorDomain":"fenderbluesjr"}

                          Straight up EGlide who is asking us to look to the future? I don't know cuz I ain't been told. But if you really think the Clintons are clean with Whitewater remember they were all but bankrupt when they left office. You go ahead and believe,because you were told too, about Bill's Monicka cigar BS. EGlide my azz, you humpin' a Honda Shadow!

                          {"commentId":6597134,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"fenderbluesjr"}
                            #5.5 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:58 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6603982,"authorDomain":"publicservant63"}

                            Whats worse? Screwing an intern or screwing up the whole country? I think Bush did far worse.. Screwing up an entire country and screwing us over internationally. I think Clinton fairs way better on this debate.. He did not make us look like complete and totally hateful bastards to the rest of the world. Lets water-board every on that thinks it is not torture 6 times a day for 30 days.. Then we'll do another poll.

                            {"commentId":6603982,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"publicservant63"}
                            • 1 vote
                            #5.6 - Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:59 AM EDT
                            {"commentId":6626952,"authorDomain":"smilingrose"}
                            Can't keep me downDeleted
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":6544024,"authorDomain":"brad-makela"}

                            Just because a superior tells you to do something, doesn't make it legal. You have to have the brains to know that. If my supervisor tells me to go steal something from another company, does that mean I should not be prosecuted for theft?

                            {"commentId":6544024,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"brad-makela"}
                            • 8 votes
                            Reply#6 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:46 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6545943,"authorDomain":"DEBE"}

                            So you must of watched A Few Good Men - Tom Cruise - you can't handle the truth.

                            To serve my country is my patriotic duty - if an officer told me to torture - I would questions the validity - but because my president - whom I have sworn my patriotic duty to tells me that legally it is not torture - then what is your answer - be tried as a traitor? Put in prison for the rest of your life and be spit upon by your fellow servicemen and women. So, it's okay to take the high moral ground when your not faced with repercussions. It's easy for us to say - yeah!! Hang them all! But you weren't there and neither was I so what we see as a simple answer - it is not.

                            {"commentId":6545943,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"DEBE"}
                            • 3 votes
                            #6.1 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6546724,"authorDomain":"keithnvalorie"}

                            reply to DEBEKI; I have served, it was in the Marine Corp.. I don't know if you have or not but by your response I feel comfortable to say you have. You describe fairly clearly the obligation to follow orders to the letter and without hesitation. Dire consequences will result if you do not. It is up to the superiors to do all the questioning about the legality of it's content. This is much like the responsibility of the civilian base to question any Leader fully before sending our young men and women into harms way.

                            {"commentId":6546724,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"keithnvalorie"}
                            • 3 votes
                            #6.2 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:39 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6553534,"authorDomain":"mikela"}

                            I'm sure Saddam Hussein's patriots all felt the very same way and why are we in Iraq today and that deck of cards... weren't they all just doing their duties and following orders too? I guess you actually have to have a brain and able to know your own rights and wrongs and how to be a good american and not just another criminal following orders. I would not have broken the law and although I may have gone to jail for not breaking laws as I was told to do, I would have been exonerated and a martyr for a higher and much more noble cause... Defending our American Constitution to the letter even against our own law breakers!

                            {"commentId":6553534,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mikela"}
                            • 5 votes
                            #6.3 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:55 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6582545,"authorDomain":"karvin-s"}

                            Also to DEBEKI; you did not swear an oath to the President, but rather to the Constitution. If you have served you know that. If given an order you do not consider legal, you are required by the military to carry them out or to ask for those orders in writing. The officer writing those orders is then accepting responsibility for them and you must carry them out. I doubt very much that this is the way the CIA operates, though.

                            {"commentId":6582545,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"karvin-s"}
                            • 3 votes
                            #6.4 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:28 AM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":6544176,"authorDomain":"packard2352"}

                            These are supposedly intelligent, educated people who should know the difference between right and wrong. The "I was just following orders" defence was used by the SS concentration camp guards. It didn't wash then either.

                            {"commentId":6544176,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"packard2352"}
                            • 9 votes
                            Reply#7 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:53 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6545203,"authorDomain":"janea33"}

                            Quite obviously these comments are coming from "Honey boys and girls", you know who you are , never served your country's military needs. There is no need for political correctness in war it is after all war. There's nothing civil nor ethical about war. Of course if you've never served or been involved in combat military operations you don't even have a clue. My rules for war were simple kill the enemy and if you couldn't then capture him by whatever means necessary and get any info(Intel) you could use to then destroy him. Capturing enemy combatants is really a waste of time and time and resourcess consuming. To all of you out there who never felt it your moral responsibility to serve your country, heed the words of one John Stuart Mill " The man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety is a miserable creature and has no chanceof being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

                            {"commentId":6545203,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"janea33"}
                            • 6 votes
                            Reply#8 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:34 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6554561,"authorDomain":"frechek1"}

                            AMEN. brother. Well spoken

                            {"commentId":6554561,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"frechek1"}
                            • 3 votes
                            #8.1 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:27 AM EDT
                            {"commentId":6555797,"authorDomain":"Rodant"}

                            I am a combat veteran with a CIB and two Air Medals. I have no desire to see my country defeat the enemy by becoming the enemy.

                            {"commentId":6555797,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"Rodant"}
                            • 11 votes
                            #8.2 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:28 AM EDT
                            {"commentId":6556519,"authorDomain":"bell6040"}

                            I don't blame the military I blame the Bush administration; politicians starts wars not the military they just carry out the orders.

                            {"commentId":6556519,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"bell6040"}
                            • 4 votes
                            #8.3 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:27 AM EDT
                            {"commentId":6573475,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

                            Well said Rodant

                            {"commentId":6573475,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                            • 3 votes
                            #8.4 - Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:37 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6583199,"authorDomain":"bhughes88"}

                            Mary, you should not be blaming the Bush administration for anything. One, waterboarding is not torture. Two, the 9/11 commission clearly stated that the Islamo-fascist were at war with the USA and that the Clinton Administration had been ignoring that fact (as is the Hussein Obama administration). Also, the person here Khalid Shaikh Mohammed has taken credit for cutting off the head of Daniel Pearl. Pour water over the head of a murdering terrorist is not torture, it is an effective means of getting information.

                            {"commentId":6583199,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"bhughes88"}
                            • 5 votes
                            #8.5 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:57 AM EDT
                            {"commentId":6585049,"authorDomain":"captd01"}

                            Well said Fred. Thank God we still have some people with brains in this country.

                            {"commentId":6585049,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"captd01"}
                            • 3 votes
                            #8.6 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:06 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6585571,"authorDomain":"gsjef"}

                            Freda-517796 is 100% correct. We wouldn' be having this conversation if we weren't attacked by these goons. They burn and drag our soldiers on the ground. Where is your patriottism people. You will be crying for our military & CIA to step in and protect you WHEN we are attacked again.

                            {"commentId":6585571,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"gsjef"}
                              #8.7 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:25 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":6586794,"authorDomain":"interchangor"}

                              Right on, Fred. Well said.

                              {"commentId":6586794,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"interchangor"}
                              • 3 votes
                              #8.8 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:14 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":6626997,"authorDomain":"histedg"}

                              Fred,

                              Thanks for justifying the actions of those Islamist crazies in your last sentence. The 9/11 hijackers fit the description in your last sentence to a "T."

                              {"commentId":6626997,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"histedg"}
                                #8.9 - Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:20 AM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":6545531,"authorDomain":"jhwright"}

                                This has been the essence of the two-party system since its invention in Great Britain ca. 1700. You strip your defeated opponents of power, of perks, of patronage. You insult them to your heart's content across the despatch boxes. But you do NOT imprison, exile, or execute them. Even if they're criminals, leave them to Heaven and to history. Any attempt to do otherwise will come back to haunt you.

                                {"commentId":6545531,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jhwright"}
                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#9 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:48 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":6545568,"authorDomain":"jhwright"}

                                This has been the essence of the two-party system since its invention in Great Britain ca. 1700. You strip your defeated opponents of power, of perks, of patronage. You insult them to your heart's content across the despatch boxes. But you do NOT imprison, exile, or execute them. Even if they're criminals, leave them to Heaven and to history. Any attempt to do otherwise will come back to haunt you.

                                {"commentId":6545568,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jhwright"}
                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#10 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":6545677,"authorDomain":"jhwright"}

                                I notice that Mr. Milhouse's comment (above) was posted twice, too. I don't know what mistake I made but I'm glad I'm not the only one who made it.

                                {"commentId":6545677,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jhwright"}
                                  Reply#11 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:54 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":6546105,"authorDomain":"mcfrech"}

                                  I was only following orders is an old excuse. I don't know if I would be brave enough to stand up for right, but if one follows orders that they feel are immoral and illegal it does not excuse them.

                                  {"commentId":6546105,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mcfrech"}
                                  • 7 votes
                                  Reply#12 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:13 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":6546372,"authorDomain":"koriemrtn"}

                                  If Obama decides to go after the Bush administration, he will do exactly that. Bush was the leader, he is responsible for torture orders. I side with the left on most all issues, but not this. I agree that torture is not the answer but just as child grows and makes mistakes in order to figure out what is socially acceptable so must a nation. This is a new kind of war fare we have ventured into. The enemy can be your neighbor, pregnant woman, or child. I'm watching our leader change the language that is used in order to help distinguish perception from reality. This transformation will not happen over night. As much as the left would love to see the right destroyed they belong here to. Even with their twisted ideals, and misguided judgement. He has enough to deal with let dying dogs lay.

                                  KSmith Oak Park, Il

                                  {"commentId":6546372,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"koriemrtn"}
                                    Reply#13 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:24 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6546567,"authorDomain":"cmgdhamel"}

                                    I would be curious if this group of folks that said yes to prosecution would agree to prosecute the navy seals and President Obama for the execution without a trial of the Somalia pirates. We were towing the boat and we had no obvious intelligence that the pirates were going to kill the captain. We only negotiated with them for about 48 hours. I would suspect that a bullet to the brain is much more severe than sleep deprivation, a bug in a box, a face slap, and simulating drowning for a few seconds. I do not think the CIA is accused of killing or even doing any permanent damage to the terrorists. The pirates from Somalia are Islamicextremist and they did not do anything as severe as killing 3000 people. They did not shoot first at the navy seals. The committed a crime but was it one that should of resulted in the death penalty without a trial. I would love to understand the logic. Is it partisan fervor or just the inability to look at anything with a honest perspective. In my opinion, Obama and Bush were both right.

                                    {"commentId":6546567,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"cmgdhamel"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#14 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:32 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6553668,"authorDomain":"mikela"}

                                    They were in the midst of committing a crime. It is of absolutely no comparison. They were shot because they gave no other choice. Obama was right, Bush was and is a war criminal period and a traitor to the American Constitution. An office he gave his biblical and political oath to uphold. He broke every law in the book period.

                                    {"commentId":6553668,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mikela"}
                                    • 6 votes
                                    #14.1 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:06 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6556525,"authorDomain":"bell6040"}

                                    That was a different situation altogether we didn't go out there and start a war nor did we toture their pirates we handled the situation at hand. The Iraq war was totally different.

                                    {"commentId":6556525,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"bell6040"}
                                    • 4 votes
                                    #14.2 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:30 AM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6590771,"authorDomain":"frank-edmundson"}

                                    Mikela and Mary-528112 both appear to be very opinionated Democrats leaning toward the socialists side. I truely feel sorry for people like you, but spent over 20 years defending your right to your opinion and mine.

                                    {"commentId":6590771,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"frank-edmundson"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    #14.3 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":6546596,"authorDomain":"johnmsyfq"}

                                    So outing the agents by posting the memos helps with future situations. What happened to your boss having your back?

                                    {"commentId":6546596,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"johnmsyfq"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#15 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:33 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6553679,"authorDomain":"mikela"}

                                    We're after their bosses back as well. All of them.

                                    {"commentId":6553679,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mikela"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    #15.1 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:07 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6571473,"authorDomain":"drbrucemac"}

                                    Exactly, milela. We need to get to the source of the problem: Cheney, Rumsfeld, Yoo, et al. And not just for torture. Also domestic spying in clear violation of existing FISA law. I think it's a package deal. Out them all.

                                    {"commentId":6571473,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"drbrucemac"}
                                      #15.2 - Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:35 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6573510,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

                                      They learned from Nixon not to protect their subordinates.

                                      {"commentId":6573510,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                                      • 2 votes
                                      #15.3 - Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:40 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6590300,"authorDomain":"msmerymac"}

                                      Not if you do something illegal. Ask G. Gordon Liddy.

                                      {"commentId":6590300,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"msmerymac"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      #15.4 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:41 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":6546907,"authorDomain":"pikerc"}

                                      The CIA agents, contracted civilian special operators, and military personal violated not only Congressional enacted statutes signed into law by the President but also the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Folks objecting to charging them should remember that the soldiers who tortured prisoners at Abu Ghraib were court martial-ed, convicted, busted and imprisoned for acts they committed under orders from supervisor. If they violated the UCMJ and were busted for it. Why can't CIA agents and others involved get the same equal treatment under the law. Not busting members of the Bush administrations and the agents who carried out their legal orders means that the rule of law in the United States in moot.

                                      If those troops can be punished then why do the CIA agents who were present and involved at torture sessions get a free pass. Not arresting the CIA agents, executive branch officials, and civilian special operators for their actions which are clearly against U.S. statutes means that the rule of law in this nation is meaningless. If these cretins get a free pass, what is to stop future criminal activity. The CIA, Military Personnel, and contracted civilian special operations teams have repeated again what they did in South Vietnam during "Operation Phoenix".

                                      Consider this. If a U.S. military troop kicked in your door, ripped your home apart, seized your weapons you bought and kept for self defense, hauled you away to a prison or black site in another nation absent regular update to your wife, kids and other family members, tortured you for intelligence you did not have about insurgents, would you not become one yourself. Fact is that the vast majority of detainees, labeled as "terrorists" were innocent civilians or bystanders.

                                      When the British lobesterbacks occupied the colonies back in the 1700's before our Revolution, their troops arrested civilains who had the termarity to resist them from forcing King George's triangle trade policies on them, taxing their earning, suspending their civil rights of free speech and protest, seized their weapons, and forced civilians to house troops.

                                      Given that the only motive for the invasion of Iraq was to terminate Saddam's recently awarded contracts to reconstruct Iraq's oil infrastructure to Russia, Syria, and China so that U.S. Energy firms could regain control of the energy industry lost in 1972 after 46 years of specific contractual non-compliance on the 75 year agreement signed in 1925, detaining and torturing suspected terrorists in violence of U.S. Criminal Codes should be punishable by prison or if the suspect died, the death penalty.

                                      {"commentId":6546907,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"pikerc"}
                                      • 7 votes
                                      Reply#16 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:47 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6556966,"authorDomain":"mpkiley54"}

                                      The CIA is not subject to the UCMJ. They sought legal advice from the US Department of Justice as to what constituted torture under the law and were told to what limits they could go. They stayed within those limits so therefore did not commit any crimes to be prosecuted for. Congress disagreed with the legal interpretation and changed the law to specifically remove water-boarding and limit harsh interrogation to the Army Field Manual rules. The system worked.

                                      You have a poor moral compass when it equates cutting off someones hand (Saddam) with slapping someone in the face (US). One is torture and the other is not.

                                      {"commentId":6556966,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mpkiley54"}
                                        #16.1 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:37 AM EDT
                                        {"commentId":6585820,"authorDomain":"dinu-focs"}

                                        Number one, there was no torture. Calling waterboarding "torture" does not make it torture.

                                        Number two, these were not "suspected" terrorists, but actual terrorists.

                                        Number three, what part of the Constitution was violated?

                                        Number four, Saddam was overthrown because his regime was in defiance of numerous U.N. resolutions. Why were there inspectors 12 years after the First Gulf war was over? There were of course no contracts with Russia, Siria, etc. as there was an U.N. sanctioned embargo against Iraq.

                                        So stop lying.

                                        {"commentId":6585820,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"dinu-focs"}
                                        • 2 votes
                                        #16.2 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:34 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":6547702,"authorDomain":"lmarct"}

                                        Tough question. Most here do not have enough information to 1) know what the most "legal" thing to do is or 2) to know what kind of "orders" or "policy" they were under. I feel like IF they acted in "good faith" participation of the specifics of the Bush policy, then they should not be tried. Those that stretch the policy and take it to extremes or use it when unnecessary SHOULD be tried.

                                        That's the problem with a "blanket" forgiveness... how do you tell the difference?

                                        And BTW, if the policy was THAT clear, then, YES, we should fully investigate the policy makers!

                                        {"commentId":6547702,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"lmarct"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#17 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:21 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":6551987,"authorDomain":"altmailbx"}

                                        As a military officer I was taught that illegal acts are always wrong no matter the circumstances. U.S. military personnel have been court-martialed for obeying an illegal orders in the past and we as a nation executed enemy officers who claimed they were just "following orders." Torturing prisoners clearly betrays our values as Americans. Seems that there is a double standard here between the military who accept responsibility and the civilians who don't.

                                        {"commentId":6551987,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"altmailbx"}
                                          Reply#18 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:51 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":6552161,"authorDomain":"altmailbx"}

                                          As a military officer we were always taught that we are responsible for our actions and that illegal actions are illegal even when directed by a superior. U.S. military personnel have been court-martialed in the past for abusing prisoners and we, as a nation, have hung Japanese and German officers for "following orders." Think of the Nuremburg trials. The way we treat prisoners will be copied by others and possibly used against Americans in some future war.

                                          {"commentId":6552161,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"altmailbx"}
                                          • 9 votes
                                          Reply#19 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:04 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":6553825,"authorDomain":"jerry-hudges"}

                                          Thzt is absolute BS, An if you are a Military Officer, you know better.
                                          I was a marine in Viet Nam, what you just said, was that you did not and would not, support your troops, when it gets tight.
                                          One f the differences, between the Marine Corps and the rest were we always knew our officers would be there for us.
                                          The Corps brought every body out including the dead.
                                          If you are a military officer, you know that all of the nonsense the half assed jerks are talking about are not even close to torture.
                                          people who sit back pass judgement and downgrade the people you force to do the dirty work.It;s a shame that we have to live in the same country, with you.
                                          Unfortunately, living in free country means we have to give even hand wringing little pansies freedom of speech and allow them to speak ill of the very people, that allow them to spout garbage. You'll have a good time, some day we'll get tired of deaking with pansies like you and take appropriate measures.
                                          The thing that really frosts me, is you don't really care, it's just an opportunity, to say Bush did it.

                                          {"commentId":6553825,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jerry-hudges"}
                                          • 4 votes
                                          #19.1 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:20 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":6555751,"authorDomain":"GoodImp"}

                                          I agree with you, Jerry. For all who equate our service members interrogating these "emeny combatants" as criminals, are thumbing your noses to all members of our armed services as mindless idiots following any input command. As veteran myself, I remember being told that if we were given an illegal command, we were to follow orders and report the alleged crime afterwards. There is a process in place to ensure we follow the law. We must be able to trust our commanders as they have obiviously more time-in-service than we have. Oh, as reporting a concern also comes under using the chain-of-command.

                                          To all of my fellow smart vets and servicemembers keep in mind that the civilian world may never understand the military way of life. And after reading some of those documents, I realized those "terrorists" are being treated better I was in boot camp. They had SERE professionals who understand when things could get out of hand. They should know because our special forces opertives are treated degrees worse than these misunderstood jihadist criminals. And everyone forget about international law. Our laws here in the US suffice to dictate what is legal or not. The interrogators indicated in writing they have been following US Codes and stated full understanding of the difference between interrogation and torture. I see those who torture as ones who enjoy the suffering of others. From what I understand, torture doesn't provide solid actionable intelligence as one will say anything to have the pain stopped. Oh by the way, if our service members and commanders should be investigated, the our civilian law enforcement officials should be as well. They interrogate, therefore they are obiviously breaking international law somewhere.

                                          Others who actually think should bear in mind that there is no reaching some who are just blind to everything around them. I just hope our elected officials aren't becoming a threat to our national security. Realing these documents are possibly worse than what the NYT has done in the past years. Disclosure of classified information improperly is a crime and considered treasonous. And as far I as I understand, the punishment for treason is death. Correct me if I'm wrong or just crazy.

                                          {"commentId":6555751,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"GoodImp"}
                                            #19.2 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:18 AM EDT
                                            {"commentId":6556534,"authorDomain":"bell6040"}

                                            Now, whose talking BS?

                                            {"commentId":6556534,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"bell6040"}
                                            • 3 votes
                                            #19.3 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:32 AM EDT
                                            {"commentId":6556556,"authorDomain":"yorichy"}

                                            Put it plain and simple .These terrorist are bent on the total destruction of our nation, no matter what it took, with no regard for the innocent. Why would should we be light on them.

                                            I wonder if we did not use these means and this nation did get attacked again, would this nation blame Bush. They sure would.

                                            In terms of comparing bush to the Nazis, not even close. The Nazis killed and tortured innocent people. Who are the people we were interrogating. People with a mission to kill the innocent

                                            Lets not forget 911 when Bush went after the Taliban; I bet most of the Bush bashers did not care what it took.

                                            {"commentId":6556556,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"yorichy"}
                                              #19.4 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:38 AM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6573599,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

                                              I believe Dan-1034340 was at least in the military, and probably was an officer as stated.

                                              As for Jerry-352313, I doubt he ever served, or if he did he was an in and out enlistee that did it for the money that never paid much attention in the classes in basic and probably never saw any real action, but wanted to badly.

                                              Anyone with any sort of real military intel training knows that torture yields nothing useful. Routinely you waste a bunch of time chasing ghosts because the tortured tell you any damn thing you want to hear to make the pain stop.

                                              I served during that nasty CF in Lebanon. They found out who did what and when without torturing anyone and didn't create any new bad guys either.

                                              {"commentId":6573599,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                                              • 4 votes
                                              #19.5 - Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:49 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6583524,"authorDomain":"bhughes88"}

                                              Well said Jerry. I served of the AF and what Dan stated here is a complete load of crap and I do not believe that he served either. What was done to these terrorist at Gitmo was not torture. Having water poured over your head and being slapped or being kept awake is not torture. Having you fingers or hands or arms or feet cut off is torture. Being electrocuted of set on fire or being whipped or having bamboo shoved under you finger and toe nails is torture. Calling this stuff torture is just another lie meant to hurt the USA in the eye's of the world. If you leftist want the USA to be liked by all the countries in the world stop lying to them about us. Liberals do more harm to the USA than they can possible imagine by constantly lying about us.

                                              {"commentId":6583524,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"bhughes88"}
                                              • 4 votes
                                              #19.6 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:09 AM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6585484,"authorDomain":"captd01"}

                                              Well said Jerry,and Proud Veteran. Thanks

                                              {"commentId":6585484,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"captd01"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              #19.7 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:22 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6585909,"authorDomain":"searay27-1"}

                                              Dan is absolutely correct, if a trooper knows an order is illegal it is his duty not to obey it.

                                              {"commentId":6585909,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"searay27-1"}
                                              • 5 votes
                                              #19.8 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6591009,"authorDomain":"frank-edmundson"}

                                              If history is correct the winners of wars are not tried. It will be the liberal idiots of our own country that would prosecute people trying to protect them.

                                              {"commentId":6591009,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"frank-edmundson"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              #19.9 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:08 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6592757,"authorDomain":"jweddig"}

                                              We as Americans defined water-boarding as torture when it was applied by other countries to our soldiers. Also, hanging a prisoner by his hands from a ceiling is also torture unless you don't consider crucifixion torture. They have the same effect on the human body except that the Romans left them to die. That's what the Bush administration did in our name and now we have to listen to the right wing nuts whine about us liberals. Suck it up - the pendulum has swung.

                                              {"commentId":6592757,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jweddig"}
                                              • 2 votes
                                              #19.10 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:22 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6594076,"authorDomain":"stone5150"}

                                              We cannot defeat our enemy by acting like them.

                                              {"commentId":6594076,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"stone5150"}
                                              • 5 votes
                                              #19.11 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:35 PM EDT
                                              Reply
                                              {"commentId":6552191,"authorDomain":"VigilancePOV"}

                                              "Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it."

                                              Remember the Nuremberg Trials, "I was only following orders, I did not give them".

                                              Some should receive jail, less prison time but Bush, Cheney, Rumfeld, Bolton, Rove, Wolfowitz, Yoo, Bybee, Gonzales, Addington and others should meet the final solution that gave orders just like the Nazi's.

                                              Those that left the CIA and refuse to take part should be rehired and promoted to higher levels of commands and receive much more pay to be the warning canary to keep fresh air on the living powerful side of integrity because in 20 - 30yrs. if no prosecution now.... then read 1st line again.

                                              {"commentId":6552191,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"VigilancePOV"}
                                              • 9 votes
                                              Reply#20 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:07 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6553767,"authorDomain":"mikela"}

                                              I totally agree. The ones that backed out should be commended and brought back into service. *claps*

                                              {"commentId":6553767,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mikela"}
                                              • 7 votes
                                              #20.1 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:14 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6553847,"authorDomain":"jerry-hudges"}

                                              Uh huh, and when they refuse a lawful order and the individual is prosecuted, you'll be right there, applauding.

                                              {"commentId":6553847,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"jerry-hudges"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              #20.2 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:21 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6554122,"authorDomain":"mikela"}

                                              But ya see, they knew lawful and unlawful and left their positions under the administration. You cannot be legally ordered to do anything illegal. Just because your boss tells you to do something or your fired or will be punished does not mean you jump on the wagon. You know right from wrong period.

                                              {"commentId":6554122,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"mikela"}
                                              • 7 votes
                                              #20.3 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:44 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6565265,"authorDomain":"yorichy"}

                                              How dare you compare Bush with the Nazi’s!!!. The Nazi’s were hell bent on destroying the Jewish race .Women and children included.

                                              What is Al-Qaida’s mission? To destroy the United States Women and children as well. Did Bush interrogate the innocent? No, He interrogated those who are sworn enemy’s of the USA. Those who raised arms against the innocent of the United States. To protect both you and I. Are we to kiss them on there hand. It don’t matter THERE MISSION IS TO DESTORY US

                                              Do ya think that WW2 was just one by guns and bombs? Did the people of the United States and our allies really cared about how the war was one. All they cared about that the war was over and they were no longer threatened.

                                              How did those Bush Bashers felt when 911 went down? They were probably behind Bush 100%. No matter what it took? Get those terrorist Mr. Bush

                                              I wonder what you would have said about Bush if this nation got attacked again during his presidency. You would probably bash him for not doing a good enough job protecting this nation.

                                              But Oh well. This is what happens to us when we put God on the back burner as a nation.

                                              {"commentId":6565265,"threadId":"556530","contentId":"2696597","authorDomain":"yorichy"}
                                                #20.4 - Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:00 PM EDT
                                                Reply
                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 13
                                                {"canLink":false,"threadId":"556530","isPrivate":false}
                                                Leave a Comment:
                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.