Anyone but Joe Jackson....I'm not sure if Katherine will have their best interests at heart....especially if they are living with Joe
Place all three kids with Katherine, allow liberal visitation by Debbie Rowe, include Blanket in all visitation. More invovlement is better
The mother didn't appear to be to reallt want those poor children before Michael died, so why now? Oh, that's right. There might be money!
I think it would be best if Madonna adopted them.
Yeah, Or, maybe Brad and Angie...
I say that whoever Michael Jackson wanted to be the guardians in the event of his passing.
I sure hope he had a will. Most parents do have wills for this reason - who will be the guardian in the event they die.
I definitely think that it should be based on what MJ wanted...im sure he had his kids best interest at hand....and Im sure being in JOE jacksons hands was never an option. Katherine Jackson should have custody, a sibling, or either the nanny if that is what MJ wanted. Debbie Rowe is a band wagoner....she just wants the kids cause she knows they have a inheritance from the "King of POP".....I swear in a few months or weeks its going to get ugly cause everyone is going to think MJ owed them something so they are going to try and dig in his pockets...or now his kids pockets for the money. People are so greedy!!!!!
Anyone but the Michael Jackson parents. Grandma may be as wonderful as any grandmother but she was never able to control the abuse in that family so there is no evidence that she would protect these children now. Hopefully there is at least one good family in the Jackson families that will care for these children. Anyone but grandma and grandpa.
The Katherine and Joe Jackson have been separated the problem was JOE....Michaels last will states he wanted his mother to have the kids or Diana Ross. Sorry but Debbie is out of the loop....and she should be....I cant stand money hungry people that is whats so corrupt about this world now.
I don't like Joe Jackson and especially after last night's bad taste where he wanted to be sure to get his plug in about his company instead of honoring the moment...his son's! But no worries, thank goodness Katherine and Joe are divorced and do not live together. Would hate to see him do to those kids what he did to his own.
Yup! that's so true. even though the Jackson Family are a huge success...to think that those childern could possibly be placed in the same position that their father was in when he was young...for me would horrible. they have been with the Jackson Family all of their lives. leave them with the only FAMILY they know. "The King of Pop" is their father and he's been taken from them. Don't take the family they've grown up with all their lives.
I fear that because she never stopped the abuse for her own children, she is unequipped to protect these children. I hate to see them with either of these grandparents just because of the abuses they have discussed openly.
Rowe is not Blanket's biological mother. Given the circumstances, it's unlikely that the court would separate the children.
Rowe IS NOT the biological mother, which is being reported now on news outlets. Neither her or Michael contributed sperm or egg to the creation of these beautiful children. I think the older brother who lives in South Carolina or North Caroline, not sure which, but on the SE Coast should be granted custody of all three children - he appears to have a "normal" family and home life.
These kids need a shot at some sort of normal life so I voted for their biological mom. I'm afraid if they are raised by Katherine and, god forbid, Joe Jackson, their fate will be the same as Michael's. He never had a chance of any type of normal life...very sad.
Joe and Katherine are no longer married nor living together.
AMEN!!!! My husband and I were just discussing the stories that were revealed years ago about the manner in which "Jackson Five" was treated by the parents, especially money driven Joe.
However, Debbie gave up all parental rights to her children. Given the fact that my biological "mom" left me at the hospital...I met her @13 yrs. of age...I don't think Debbie is a very good role model.Let's face it, those children are in for a life of hell!
MANY prayers are needed for them.
Hi GWINTER, I think that the children are young enough that if they are injected with normalcy from now on they may have a chance. Who is to say what normal is. Most celebrities have Nannies and staff that raise their children. Joe at this point is too old to pull the stunts that he did back in the day and remember that these kids have aunts and uncles that have managed to live relatively normal lives and raise fairly normal kids. Katherine is going to get custody and Michael's older siblings will end up raising those kids. It may not be normal to you or I but it will probably be more in line with the lifestyle that they are used to. Lets try and stay positive.
From what I've read of MJ's children, they have been quite isolated from what would be a part of most children's lives. They've never been to school, they were homeschooled. They've never really been around other children in a normal setting. When taking them to places, such as museums, they always went after they were closed.
This isn't to say that the kids aren't well educated. I've read they know at least 4 languages and Michael always ephasized reading and the arts. The kids are, by all accounts, well behaved and quite charming.
Whatever happens, they are in for some real culture shock. Their life as they know it is gone forever.
Yours is the first sensible response I've seen on this thread. That being said; what is "normal" and just what does that imply? Michael was eccentric, but he wasn't crazy or stupid. Many of his peers assail him as being a very astute businessman and excellent father, so what does "normal" mean as concerns The Family Jackson? Some women think that getting beat by their male friend, husband, etc. means that he loves her!! Some men think that when a woman says no! she really means yes. These people think everyone is the same as them and that they are normal??? Debbie Rowe made a deal, gave up all parental rights to her two children with Michael, took the money, and faded to wherever. I don't think her case is as strong as some experts would have us believe. I think you are point on Misssteward; the older siblings will raise these children just as so many of our own families do under these same circumstances.
Two thoughts, one optimistic, the other not. What if D. Rowe realized she made a mistake. This may be a second chance to right a wrong. She could ask for them back. I think if a mom truly wanted her children back and could provide for them, then she should be given an opportunity. However she may be used to being carefree and with money.
I think wanting her grandchildren is admirable, but Mrs. Jackson is up in age. What happens to the children should something happen to her? What would that do to them emotionally?
If Michael is as smart as some say, he made accommodations for his children. We should wait and see. In the meantime, let grandma take care of them.
Anyone but Joe Jackson. DO NOT LET HIM NEAR THOSE KIDS!
Keep Joe Jackson away from them. Michael would be horrified at the thought of him having any influence in their lives!!! The man is a monster!
The biological mother. Previously, Ms. Rowe had been awarded custodial rights through an appeal. Clearly, she was pressured to give up those rights, either through money or coersion. How can an ordinary person hope to stand up to the wealthy and the powerful? There is no indication that she would be a bad parent. And why was she denied even visitation? At least with the mother, the two older children will finally be given the chance to realize a normal childhood.
I don't think Ms. Rowe was given 'free choice" in her decision to give up parental rights. I think the entire Jackson family is disfunctional. The children should not be separated and should be cared for by people who will love and nurture them - people with no dollar signs in the eyes.
What's also important is that a plan B is set in place for these three young children. Katherine and Joe are older and may not live to see these kids into adulthood. Rather than leave any loose ends for the future, this family needs to act smart now and calculate each step. Fact is that the Jackson family has money. This will not play out like the Anna Nicole story did where all her hangers-on wanted a piece of the pie. Michael was in a family of millionaires so the motivation here to take the kids is different. I wish the whole family the best in what appears to be just a heartbreaking time.
Let Angelina Jolie have them - I'm sure she needs more and she's got the money to pay for raising them without Michael's estate money (if there's any left....)
Well, I have to agree 100% with Champateam. Joe Jackson completely disgraced his family with the "standoff-ish" attitude and that tactless, cheap plug in about his company. It's pretty obvious the man has no grace, not an ounce of compassion. Michael Jackson left behind a legacy and carried millions of people's hearts with him. Joe Jackson, on the other hand, left behind a different kind of legacy, and had earned EVEN MORE disgust & hatred from millions of people. He'll pay for his in the end. Michael hated his father, and after last nights' "show", it's easy to see why. Joe Jackson showed his true colors last night.
Could not agree with you more!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I thought I was the only one feeling the way I did about Joe Jackson's interview. I could not beleive he was trying to promote a record company during this time of greif. I just pray for these children. Whether or not Michael Jackson is or isn't the father of these children they need a loving, caring and stable life with whom ever they will be with.
Debbie Rowe willingly gave up her rights and has said so on numerous occasions. My thought is that Debbie can now choose to keep closer tabs on the children if she chooses but if they are familiar with Mrs. Jackson, staying with their grandmother is the absolutly least disruption that they can suffer during this time. Debbie Rowe is a stranger to them.
I don't believe for one minute that she will not care for the children to the best of her ability. I DO believe that this is a preemptive strike to pull ANY VIABLE ASSESTS under Joe's domain. Control the children, Control the minor's potential assets.
Tell Sharpton and Jackson to shove off. DANG these bozo's can't wait for the publicity around them when they interject their dumb A.. opinions and false friendships. BLAH to both of them!!! Publicity WHORES!!!!!!!!!!
I will admit Rick, I was surprised to see Joe Jackson and The Rev. Al out and around so soon after his death... They appear to be handling all this really well for the shock that it was. Makes one wonder if they knew about his failing heath.
Misssteward you were doing ok for a while there, don't fall off into the stupid place. Everyone who cared to know knew about his failing health! Not everyone dislikes or disapproves of the Rev. Al Sharpton. He isn't what's wrong with the US, or the Africam American community. People do call to ask him and Jesse Jackson to come when they feel the need to have them present. I will not comment on Joe Jackson; there is no need to do so.
You know the situation with the children being there when he died is trama enough. Leave them where they are comfortable. If that is Ms. Katherine's home so be it. But don't forget Joe is also a grandparent. I think just being away from Michael and the weird life they had to live will be comforting to them. But the next question to be asked is how much damage has already been done to those children. All we can do is keep them in prayer.
First of all, it troubles me that the Jackson family didn't intervene when Michael's life began spiraling out of control especially when chidren are involved. It is obvious that his health was declining and that others warned of his prescription pill dependence. In the best interest of the children, they should stay together and be raised by their grandmother. Debbie Rowe should have visitation rights to her biological children. My only concern is a possibility that Joe Jackson may try to exploit these children for financial gain. It was clearly Michael's wishes that these children be brought up away from the media and live private lives that he so desperately wanted for himself. I pray that Katherine and Michael's siblings give these children the love and stability they will need throughout their lives. It is a sad, sad situation...
How do you know they did not intervene as best they could, advise-wise. But, just as you would not let outsiders (family or no) tell you how to raise yoru kids, I'm sure no one else had much say over Michael's parenting. And it should BE that way, as long as he was not harming them.
It would be horrible to split up these siblings! The Jackson clan is the only family they have known, they need to stay with their grandmother. Rowe should be able to visit if she chooses, and if the children want to know her, but Katherine should have custody of all three.
None of Katherine Jackson's other grandchildren are performing in show business - so there is no LOGICAL basis for thinking that she will do anything but raise them as Michael Jackson - their loving father - would have wanted i.e. out of the public eye as much as possible until they reach adulthood. And for any smarties - this means that none of Joe Jackson's other grandchildren have been exploited in any way either.
Their biological grandmother ( Katherine Jackson) is the best choice for the kids. Why should the courts or anyone else consider Debbie Rowe's "parental rights" since she had given them up and hasn't been a part of their lives before now? The kids feelings and well-being should be the primary concern now and that would be to keep their lives as normal as possible which would mean for them to be surrounded by people that they are already familiar with and that care about them. And of course the two oldest children are old enough that they should be asked what they want as well. Foster care is never the best choice over genuinely loving and caring biological family members that want the kids.
It probably should be the Kathrine Jackson since she is the closes "MOTHER" figure those kids know. But heaven forbid if Joe Jackson gets his hands in there. He will ruin them just like he did his own son. He should be totally assamed of himself for the alleged things that he did to his children. That man should of never had children. Now he wants to still make money off of Michael. He is a total dueche bag.....and super ugly man. And if Katherine is smart she will keep those kids away from him and if anything ever starts to happen to them hopefully she will have the balls to speak up and kick his A- -. Big a strong women Katherine your grandchildren are depending on you.
i don't think the granparents should get them at all all they want is the money. the way joe treated his kids i wouldn't want them to be with them. everyone in that family is toooo busy with their own life. let the mother have them
And you now this how?
And, Joe is not with Katherine.
Obviously many individuals do not remain aware of things....like Katherine's & Joe's divorce! I wish I could find a way to get those kids. Toatally normal at my house. Florida, water front, my two boys fish, boat, swim and play outdoors almost everyday!Although they do attend a private school, it is faith based and at 7 & 4, they are very much aware of God and his blessings. Those three children will probably never be aware of any type of religion until they are "of age" and then it will probably be too late!
God be with them and whomever obtains custody.
I pray that these children are treated the same as the other grandchildren; however, there are a couple of major differences: (1) The parents of the other grandchildren are living, and I don't believe Katherine is their primary caregiver or legal guardian. Obviously, the Jackson siblings have chosen (probably from own experience) to keep their children out of entertainment. (2) Michael's children do not have a living parent, so Katherine will become their legal guardian. If one was to look at the Jackson family's success, Michael Jackson was clearly the icon of this family. His legacy lives on in these children, similar to Lisa Marie, the daughter of Elvis.
They should be with Michael's mom, that's all they know. Especially since Debby Rowe SOLD her rights away.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
If they know their bio mom and want to be with her, they should be with her. But not if she is a stranger to them.